OXFORD, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: COLE'S NEW ENGLAND TANK CO.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of COLE'S NEW ENGLAND TANK CO. in RT. 121, OXFORD, ME 04270 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109792929.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COLE'S NEW ENGLAND TANK CO.
- Site address
- RT. 121
- City
- OXFORD
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04270
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3443
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- May 25, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $690 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Asphyxiation, chemical poisoning and/or death from the hazards of oxygen deficiency and/or dangerous accumulations of toxic fumes and gases (such as carbon monoxide, metal fume and petroleum products) while fully entering transport delivery tanks of up to 12,000 gallon capacity to grind and weld the interior surfaces of these aluminum, stainless, and mild steel tanks. These hazards resulted from deficiencies in the company's tank entry program which included the following: a) Lack of supervisory controls over the work being performed in the tanks. b) Failure to test the atmosphere of the tank for oxygen deficiency before employee(s) are permitted to enter tanks. c) Failure to re-evaluate the atmosphere of the tank for flammables and/or toxics when changes in conditions in the tank may introduce new hazards to the space. d) Lack of specific training provided to employees in the hazards associated with entering confined spaces such as tanks, along with methods they can take to minimize them. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods one feasible and acceptable method to correct these hazards is to establish a written confined space entry program that will establish management controls over the work being performed and shall contain as a minimum, but not necessari- ly limited to the following elements: a) Written procedures concerning a permit system, ventilation, atmosphere testing, rescue procedures, and employee training. b) The completion and posting of a confined space entry permit which requires authorization and approval in writing that specifies the location and type of work to be done and certifies that all existing and potential hazards have been evaluated by a qualified person and necessary protective measures have been taken to assure the safety of each worker. c) Mechanical ventilation of the confined space prior to entry and continued ventilation to provide a safe atmosphere when determined necessary as described in (b) above. d) Testing of the atmosphere of the confined space prior to entry and on a regular basis for the presence of sufficient oxygen (19.5%) and the absence of hazardous levels of toxic or combustible gases or vapors when determined necessary as described in (b) above. e) Emergency rescue procedures with a requirement that trained personnel are available and are stationed outside the confined space with proper equipment to provide rescue of persons entering the space as determined necessary as described in (b) above. Such equipment must include safety harnesses and lifelines with provisions for hoisting employees from the confined space. If entry is required for rescue, the rescuing employee(s) must be equipped with a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) or other equivalent respiratory protection plus other appropriate personal protective equipment. f) Training of any and all employees required to enter the confined space. This training shall include the procedures required prior to entry and the hazards associated with work in confined spaces. This would include the wearing of a body harness and tended lifeline attached to a hoist or jib; work practices to be followed while cleaning and locking out any moving or energized parts before work is allowed to begin.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $690.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $90 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $90.00
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.134 A02
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- May 25, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $150 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $150.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $120 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $120.00
- · Z (S) $300.00
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $150 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $150.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.243 C01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $120 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $120.00
- · Z (S) $300.00
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $90 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $90.00
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $120 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $120.00
- · Z (S) $300.00
1910.304 F05 VC
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $210 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $210.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.304 A02
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $210 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $210.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.305 G01 IIIA
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 1992
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- May 25, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $120 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $120.00
- · Z (S) $300.00
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $225
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.24 G
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 1992
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 1992
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1992
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Mar 31, 1992
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 1992
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 109792929.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.