TORRINGTON, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ADAMS HOUSE HEALTHCARE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ADAMS HOUSE HEALTHCARE in 80 FERN DRIVE, TORRINGTON, CT 06790 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 109820928.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ADAMS HOUSE HEALTHCARE
- Site address
- 80 FERN DRIVE
- City
- TORRINGTON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06790
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8059
- Employees
- 90
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that health care workers who had direct contact with blood or body fluids were not adequately protected from potential infections due to a possible immune deficiency from a sero conversion. IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES, THE EMPLOYER DID NOT ENSURE THAT THE EMPLOYEES WERE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM POTENTIAL INFECTIONS IN THAT: 1. THE EMPLOYER DID NOT PROVIDE THE HBV VACCINE TO THE NURSES AND CERTIFIED NURSE AIDES WHO WERE EXPOSED TO BODY FLUIDS. 2. THE EMPLOYER'S PROGRAM DID NOT ENSURE THAT EMPLOYEES EXPOSED TO BLOOD AND/OR BODY FLUIDS SHALL BE EVALUATED CLINICALLY AND WITH HIV TESTING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER THE EXPOSURE, FURTHER EVALUATIONS AT 6 WEEKS, 16 WEEKS, AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE INCIDENT. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD WOULD BE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EMPLOYEE TRAINING PROGRAM EMPHASIZING THE FOLLOWING: 1. EMPLOYEES WHO POTENTIALLY ARE EXPOSED TO BODY FLUIDS SHALL BE OFFERED THE HEPATITUS VACCINATION FREE OF CHARGE IN AMOUNTS AND AT TIMES PRESCRIBED BY STANDARD MEDICAL PRACTICE. 2. AFTER AN EXPOSURE, THE HEALTH CARE WORKERS SHALL BE EVALUATED CLINICALLY AND BY HIV ANTIBODY TESTING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AND ADVISED TO REPORT AND SEEK MEDICAL EVALUATION OF ANY ACUTE FEASIBLE ILLNESS THAT OCCURS WITHIN TWELVE WEEKS AFTER EXPOSURE. HIV SERONEGATIVE WORKERS SHALL BE RETESTED 6 WEEKS PAST EXPOSURE, AND ON A PERIODIC BASIS THEREAFTER (12 WEEKS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER EXPOSURE. 12 MONTHS IS RECOMMENDED).
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $1,660 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to excessive, repetative lifting and other strenuous operations while performing normal required operations as nurses and certified nurse aides: IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES, THE EMPLOYER DID NOT ENSURE THAT THE EMPLOYEES WERE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EXCESSIVE LIFTING AND OTHER STRENUOUS ACTIVITIES: 1) FOR A PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS, WATER MATTRESSES WERE PLACED ON RESIDENT'S BEDS AS PRESSURE RELIEF DEVICES. THE ADDED WEIGHT OF THE MATTRESSES SUBJECTED EMPLOYEES TO EXCESSIVE LIFTING AND PULLING OPERATIONS WHILE "ROLLING UP" PATIENTS. 2) TWO-THIRDS OF THE PATIENT BEDS IN THE FACILITY HAVE THE BED CRANK POSITIONED IN A MANNER WHICH REQUIRES A STOPPED POSITION WHILE CRANKING THE BED UP. THE POSITION, COMBINED WITH A WORN, INADEQUATELY LUBRICATED SHAFT AND AXLE, SUBJECTS EMPLOYEES TO STRAIN INJURIES. 3) SOME NEW AND TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES ARE OVERLY CAUTIONS AND MAY NOT CONTRIBUTE EQUALLY TO LIFTING, TRANSFERRING AND/OR ASSISTING OPERATIONS. REGULAR, MORE EXPERIENCED EMPLOYEES WOULD THEN BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE MAJORITY OF THE OPERATION WHICH COULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LIMIT. AMONG OTHER METHODS, FEASIBLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND ENGINEERING CONTROLS COULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: 1) DEVELOP A COMPANY POLICY TO ENSURE THAT WHEN A NEW PRODUCT IS CONSIDERED FOR USE, THAT IT IS THOROUGHLY TESTED TO DETERMINE IF IT WILL COMPROMISE THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF WORKERS REQUIRED TO WORK WITH IT BEFORE IT IS IMPLEMENTED. 2) PHASE IN RESIDENT BEDS THAT ARE MORE ERGONOMICALLY CORRECT AS NEW FURNITURE IS PURCHASED. ALSO, AS AN INTERIM MEASURE, CONSIDER ASSIGNING RESIDENTS THAT ARE LIGHTER OR MORE CAPABLE OF HELPING THEMSELVES TO BOTTOM CRANK BEDS TO REDUCE THE OVERALL STRAIN ON EMPLOYEES. 3) DEVELOP A COMPANY POLICY TO SCREEN TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES TO VERIFY CERTIFICATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF LIFTING TECHNIQUES. ALSO, DEVELOP POLICY TO HANDLE OVERLY CAUTIOUS OR INEXPERIENCED EMPLOYEES WHO CAN NOT CONTRIBUTE EQUALLY TO LIFTING OPERATIONS. 4) UTILIZE THE HOYER LIFT ON A REGULAR BASIS AND CONDUCT A SURVEY TO DETERMINE WHICH RESIDENTS SHOULD BE INITIALLY SET UP WITH HOYER PADS TO AID EMPLOYEES WHO MUST ASSIST HIM/HER LATER IN THE DAY. 5) RESEARCH AVAILABLE OPTIONS TO PROVIDE NON-SLIP SHOES TO RESIDENTS OR HOW TO CONVERT SOLES TO NON-SLIPS. 6) DEVELOP AN ERGONOMICS TASK FORCE CONSISTING OF MANAGEMENT, NURSES AND NURSE AIDES TO PERIODICALLY DISCUSS ERGONOMIC PROBLEMS AND WORK TOGETHER TO IMPLEMENT FEASIBLE, EFFECTIVE CONTROLS TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE EXPOSURES TO EMPLOYEES.
Recent events (4)
- — I $2500.00
- — Z $5000.00
- — F (S) $1660.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jul 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jul 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $340 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $340.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1910.305 G01 III
- Issued
- Jul 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 1991
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Adams House Healthcare
View Adams House Healthcare's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 109820928.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.