Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MAROCK, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MAROCK, INC. in 856 FM 2952, CHICO, TX 76431 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 110040532.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Marock, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marock, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAROCK, INC.
Site address
856 FM 2952
City
CHICO
State
TX
ZIP
76431
Mailing
P.O. BOX 29672, DALLAS, TX 75229
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2951
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 1996
Abate by
Sep 25, 1996
Penalty
Initial $49,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:
The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
was free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to
employees in that employees were exposed to being caught-in machinery or
equipment during
an unexpected start-up while employees were performing servicing on that
machine or
equipment.
Prior to performance of servicing on an asphalt hopper and conveyor system
at the asphalt plant,
the employer did not ensure that this machinery was isolated from its
energy source and the
energy isolating source was locked out.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this
hazard is to establish
and strictly enforce work practices for the deenergization and lock-out of
machinery while
working on this machinery and notification of affected employees; i.e.,
those employees
operating or who may operate machinery; of lockout.  Issuance of
identifiable locks to
employees who perform work on machinery requiring lockout and a written
policy with training
for all authorized and affected employees regarding lockout/tagout
procedures would, at a
minimum, abate this hazard.
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE:
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):The employer did not establish a program consisting
of an energy
control procedure and employee training to ensure that before any employee
performed any
servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the enexpected
energizing, start-up
or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or
equipment would be
isolated and rendered inoperative.  An employee in the asphalt plant
performing work on an
asphalt hopper did not have the conveyor on which he was standing locked
out or otherwise
rendered inoperative.  This employee was exposed to being caught between
the hopper and the
conveyor slats.or
Recent events (3)
  • · I (S) $5000.00
  • · A (W) $49000.00
  • · Z (W) $49000.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 110040532.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.