CHICO, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: MAROCK, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MAROCK, INC. in 856 FM 2952, CHICO, TX 76431 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 110040532.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAROCK, INC.
- Site address
- 856 FM 2952
- City
- CHICO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76431
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 29672, DALLAS, TX 75229
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2951
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Aug 12, 1996
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $49,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being caught-in machinery or equipment during an unexpected start-up while employees were performing servicing on that machine or equipment. Prior to performance of servicing on an asphalt hopper and conveyor system at the asphalt plant, the employer did not ensure that this machinery was isolated from its energy source and the energy isolating source was locked out. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to abate this hazard is to establish and strictly enforce work practices for the deenergization and lock-out of machinery while working on this machinery and notification of affected employees; i.e., those employees operating or who may operate machinery; of lockout. Issuance of identifiable locks to employees who perform work on machinery requiring lockout and a written policy with training for all authorized and affected employees regarding lockout/tagout procedures would, at a minimum, abate this hazard. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE: 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure and employee training to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the enexpected energizing, start-up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated and rendered inoperative. An employee in the asphalt plant performing work on an asphalt hopper did not have the conveyor on which he was standing locked out or otherwise rendered inoperative. This employee was exposed to being caught between the hopper and the conveyor slats.or
Recent events (3)
- · I (S) $5000.00
- · A (W) $49000.00
- · Z (W) $49000.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 110040532.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.