FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY in 401 WEST BIDDISON, FORT WORTH, TX 76110 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 110363363.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY
- Site address
- 401 WEST BIDDISON
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76110
- Mailing
- POST OFFICE BOX 1837, FORT WORTH, TX 76101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2074
- Employees
- 78
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1993
- Penalty
- Current $2,250
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a. Employees who must enter confined spaces such as storage tanks, pits, and seed house tunnels were exposed to the hazard of engulfment from unprocessed cottonseed. Among other methods, feasible ;and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard are: 1. Implement the present confined space program by providing appropriate personnel, training, and equipment for work in confined spaces on all shifts. Also, develop the program to be specific to the facility. 2. Remove compacted cottonseed from the wall of the storge tank by working above the areas of compacted seed. The employer is not limited to abatement methods suggested by OSHA, i.e., methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. Other methods of abatement may be equally or more appropriate. Ultimate responsibility for determining the most appropriate abatement method rests with the employer, given its superior knowledge of the specific conditions on its worksite. The violation(s) described in this citation are alleged to have occurred on or about the day(s) the inspection was made unless otherwise indicated within the description given below each violation.
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $2250.00
- — Z (S)
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Dec 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Feb 5, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
More inspections at Southern Cotton OIL Company
View Southern Cotton OIL Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 110363363.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.