CORPUS CHRISTI, TX —
OSHA Inspection: INTERNATIONAL RESISTIVE CO. OF TX LP DBA IRC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INTERNATIONAL RESISTIVE CO. OF TX LP DBA IRC in 4222 S. STAPLES, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78411 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 110400322.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INTERNATIONAL RESISTIVE CO. OF TX LP DBA IRC
- Site address
- 4222 S. STAPLES
- City
- CORPUS CHRISTI
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78411
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3676
- Employees
- 288
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
42 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,575 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $1575.00
- — Z (S) $3150.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,575 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $1575.00
- — Z (S) $3150.00
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,575 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $1575.00
- — Z (S) $3150.00
1910.134 F02 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $675 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $675.00
- — Z (S) $1350.00
1910.134 F02 IV
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 C01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.1025 E01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.1025 E03 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 G01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.1025 I02 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 I03 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 I03 II
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 I03 III
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 G02 VIII
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.1025 H02 II
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 M02 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 J01 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.1025 L01 IV
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1025 L02 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
1591
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 H02 II
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $1,575 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $1575.00
- — Z (S) $3150.00
1910.1200 H02 III
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $63,000 · Current $21,614 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that they were exposed to cumulative trauma disorders: a) Pre Tech, Hand R Test: Employees test electronic parts for defects. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to frequent pinch grips with wrist deviation and finger force, inadequate seating and repeated lifting of the arm which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct these hazards are: 1) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. 2) Educate employees in body mechanics. 3) Realign testing equipment to eliminate wrist deviation. 4) Automate this process. 5) Provide adjustable work station. 6) Provide fully adjustable ergonomically correct seating. b) Pre Tech, Lifting Trays: Employees lift and move trays of resistors. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to frequent and awkward lifting which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Provide lift device. 2) Position shelves to eliminate stretching and bending to load trays. c) Pre Tech, Molding: Employees mold resistors. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to, repeated and excesive reaches, pinch grips with finger force and deviation of the wrist and extended periods of standing which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. 2) Rearrange work station to minimize reaches. 3) Provide ergonomically designed tools. 4) Maintain forceps in proper working condition. 5) Modify work area to include lift device. 6) Provide anti-fatigue mats, sit/stand stools; or foot rests. 7) Provide adjustable work stations. d) Tan Film, PFC, Dicing: Employees monitor, adjust hand knobs and activate buttons to allow the machine to perform the operations. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to, standing for extended periods and use of excessive force with thumbs which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Adjust control panel to reduce force required for activation. %% 2) Instruct employees on the proper usage of the machine. 3) Provide sit/stand stools or foot rests. e) Tan Film, Jade Bonding: Employee places a wafer into a jig and then places a band device over top of the wafer. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as but not limited to, repeated pinch grips and twisting of the torso which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorder. Among other methods, some feasible and exceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Redesign of work station to eliminate abducting the elbow and provide adjustability. 2) Provide ergonomic tools. 3) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in muscloskeletal acitivity. f) Tan Film, Lidding: Employees places a strip of material onto a band with forcep. This task requires ergonomic stresses such as but not limited to, repeated pinch grip with finger force, abduction of arms, repeated lifts which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorder. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. 2) Provide ergonomically designed tool. 3) Round off or pad the edges of the work surface. 4) Redesign the work station to eliminate repeated lifting of the arm. g) PFC, Loading: Employees place small parts into a plastic sheet using forceps. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to, frequent pinch grips often with wrist deviation and forceful finger force which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. 2) Educate employees on body mechanics 3) Automate this process. 4) Provide ergonomically designed tools. h) Tan Film, Pre Punch: Employees place material on punch and activate a two hand control. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to, frequent lifting of both arms with elbow abducted, reaching with arms, contact trauma and repeated deviations of the wrist which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. 2) Lower position of the press. 3) Decrease the distance (width) and rearrange the position of the controls between activation controls. 4) Automate this process. 5) Round off or pad the edges of the work surface. i) Tan Film, Reading/Testing: Employees test electronic parts for defects. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as but not limited to, frequent pinch grips, head movements, and repeated thumb activation which are likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct these hazards are: 1) Job rotation which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. 2) Educate employees in body mechanics. 3) Provide tools that eliminate the use of the pinch grip. 4) Reduce the force needed with current probes. 5) Provide work stations or chairs with forearm support. 6) Provide fully adjustable ergonomically correct seating. 7) Redesign lever to reduce thumb repetitions and distance traveled. j) Tan Film, Solder Station: Employees grip electronic components with hand held device and dip into solder bath. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as but not limited to, frequent use of extended hand grasp, repetitive extended pinch grips to hold the components for dipping which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Instruct employee in the proper use of tools. 2) Provide ergonomically designed tool. 3) Redesign work station to eliminate elevation and abduction of arm during operation. k) Tan Film, Traying and Detraying in Burn-In Lab: Employees move components from a tray and place in boxes or trays This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to frequent and forceful pinch grips, and abduction of the elbows which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Redesign the clamping unit. 2) Provide ergonomically designed tools. 3) Provide an adjustable work station. l) Tan Film, Trimming and Bending: Employee performs bending operation by placing band of material on a press and activating the press to bend the legs on a multipin component. This task requires ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to, frequent lifting of both arms, finger force with severe deviation of wrist which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. 2) Lower the position of the press. 3) Automate this process. 4) Replace thumb nuts with an actuator lever. m) Tan Film, Loading Hemostats: Employees place small components (CCN's) to be soldered into hemostat and secure the handle clamp together locking the component into place. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to, frequent and forceful pinch grips and contact trauma which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorder. %% Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Provide ergonomically designed tool. 2) Round off or pad the edges of the work surface. 3) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. n) Thick Film, Manual Marking: Employees place components on an inked pad for marking. This task requires various ergonomic stresses such as, but not limited to, frequent pinch grips and finger activations, repeated arm lifts and twisting and reaching to the side which are likely to result in cumulative trauma disorders. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are: 1) Job rotation schedule which allows for variations in musculoskeletal activity. 2) Rearrange work station. 3) Automate this process. 4) Modify operation to eliminate manual munipulation.
Recent events (2)
- — J (W) $21614.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $63,000 · Current $21,614 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (W) $21614.00
- — Z (W) $63000.00
1904.4
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $2,161 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (W) $2161.00
- — Z (W) $6300.00
1910.20 E03 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (W)
- — Z (W)
1904.5 A
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $2,161 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (W) $2161.00
- — Z (W) $6300.00
1904.5 C
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (W)
- — Z (W)
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $450 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (O) $450.00
- — Z (O) $900.00
1910.20 G01 III
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 B03
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 E05
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 E05 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 F02 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 F05 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1048 D01 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1048 N02 I
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Nov 4, 1992
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1994
Recent events (2)
- — J (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at International Resistive CO. of TX LP DBA IRC
View International Resistive CO. of TX LP DBA IRC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 110400322.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.