BRUNSWICK, ME —
OSHA Inspection: MAPLE LEAF CONSTRUCTION GROUP
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of MAPLE LEAF CONSTRUCTION GROUP in MEDICAL CENTER DRIVE, BRUNSWICK, ME 04011 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 112801725.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAPLE LEAF CONSTRUCTION GROUP
- Site address
- MEDICAL CENTER DRIVE
- City
- BRUNSWICK
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04011
- Mailing
- 222 MAIN STREET, WATERVILLE, ME 04901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1542
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2003
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing injuries, lacerations and broken and fractured bones when 13 roof trusses collapsed: Medical Center Drive - The employer did not hire a professional engineer to design bracing requirements for truss installation as recommended by the manufacturer of the trusses and the Truss Plate Institute. Among other methods, one feasible means of abatement would be to hire a professional engineer to design proper bracing requirements for truss installation.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2100.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $2100.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2003
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing injuries, lacerations, and broken and fractured bones when 13 roof trusses collapsed: Medical Center Drive - The employer did not properly brace roof trusses as per the Truss Plate Institute. The employer did not install the Stabilizer per manufacturer specifications. This resulted in 13 roof trusses collapsing sending 4 employees to the hospital. Among other methods, one feasible means of abatement would be to follow the recommendations of the Truss Plate Institute and the manufacturer specification of the Stabilizer.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2100.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2003
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $750.00
- — F (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2003
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2003
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $750.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $750.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 112801725.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.