CHICOPEE, MA —
OSHA Inspection: LUDLOW TECHNICAL PRODUCTS
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of LUDLOW TECHNICAL PRODUCTS in TWO LUDLOW PARK DR, CHICOPEE, MA 01022 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 112879978.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUDLOW TECHNICAL PRODUCTS
- Site address
- TWO LUDLOW PARK DR
- City
- CHICOPEE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01022
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2672
- Employees
- 350
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 2, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,300 Reduced
A101
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards where aluminum dusts were generated. The hazards were caused by the following conditions: THE EMPLOYER DID NOT FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARD SECTIONS OF THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATIONS (NFPA) CODES ON ALUMINUM PROCESSING AND FINISHING INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DESIGN, STRENGTH, FIRE PROTECTION, AND DUST COLLECTION. a) NFPA STANDARD NUMBER 65, CHAPTER 2-1, DUST COLLECTION ,SUBPART 21.5, THE ABRADER'S DRY TYPE DUST COLLECTOR WAS NOT LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. b) NFPA STANDARD NUMBER 65, CHAPTER 2-2, DUCTS AND DUCTWORK, SUBPART 2-2.5 THE DUCTWORK EXHAUSTING THE ABRADER TO THE DUST COLLECTOR WAS NOT OF METAL CONSTRUCTION WITH SMOOTH INTERIOR SURFACES. c) NFPA STANDARD NUMBER 65, CHAPTER 2-4, DRY TYPE DUST COLLECTORS, SUBPART 2-4.2, THE SIMCO DUST COLLECTOR USED FOR THE COLLECTION OF ALUMINUM DUSTS FROM THE ABRADER UTILIZED FILTER MEDIA MADE FROM SYNTHETIC FABRICS WHICH ACCUMULATE HIGH STATIC CHARGE. d) NFPA STANDARD NUMBER 65, CHAPTER 2-4, DRY TYPE DUST COLLECTORS, SUBPART 2-4.3 ALUMINUM DUST GENERATED BY THE ABRADING PROCESS WAS NOT REMOVED FROM THE SIMCO DRY COLLECTOR AT LEAST DAILY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBPART. e) NFPA STANDARD NUMBER 65, CHAPTER 2-4 DRY TYPE DUST COLLECTORS, SUBPART 2-4.5 THE ABRADERS DRY TYPE DUST COLLECTION EQUIPMENT WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH EXPLOSION VENTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 68 WHERE AN EXPLOSION HAZARD EXISTED. f) NFPA STANDARD NUMBER 65, CHAPTER 3-1, FIRE SAFE PRACTICES, SUBPART 3-1.4. A SEARS WET DRY VAC NOT SPECIFICALLY APPROVED FOR THE COLLECTION OF REACTIVE COMBUSTIBLE METAL DUSTS WAS USED TO SUPPLEMENT THE ABRADERS EXHAUST VENTILATION SYSTEM AND FOR CLEAN UP OF FUGITIVE ALUMINUM DUST IN AND AROUND THE ABRADING MACHINE AND DUST COLLECTING EQUIPMENT . g) NFPA STANDARD NUMBER 65, CHAPTER 5. FIRE PROTECTION,SUBPART 5-1.1; THE EMPLOYER DID NOT PROVIDE A CLASS D TYPE FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN THE ALUMINUM ABRADING AREA WHERE METAL DUST WAS PRESENT. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THESE HAZARDS IS TO HAVE THE ABRADER, ITS OPERATING PROCEDURES, AND DUST COLLECTION SYSTEM MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATIONS CODES FOR FOR PROCESSING AND FINISHING OF ALUMINUM AS SET FORTH BY NFPA 65 1987, AND ALL OTHER CODES REFERENCED BY NFPA 65.
Recent events (2)
- — A (S) $1300.00
- — Z (S) $2625.00
1910.157 G03
- Issued
- Feb 2, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,325 Reduced
A101
Recent events (2)
- — A (S) $1325.00
- — Z (S) $2625.00
1910.307 B02
- Issued
- Feb 2, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
A101
Recent events (2)
- — A (S) $2250.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Feb 2, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — A (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.1200 D02
- Issued
- Feb 2, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — A (S) $2250.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Feb 2, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 7, 1995
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 112879978.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.