ALEXANDER, ND ·
OSHA Inspection: ROUGHRIDER GRAIN COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROUGHRIDER GRAIN COMPANY in HIGHWAY 85, ALEXANDER, ND 58831 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 113324453.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROUGHRIDER GRAIN COMPANY
- Site address
- HIGHWAY 85
- City
- ALEXANDER
- State
- ND
- ZIP
- 58831
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 145, ALEXANDER, ND 58831
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4221
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 6, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $188 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) Employees were exposed to a potential crushing hazard while working near the base of the manually operated manlifts in the west elevator and the east elevator due to the lack of a guardrail around the base. Among other methods, one feasible method to correct this hazard would be to install guardrails around the base. (b) Employees were exposed to a potential fall hazard while operating the manually operated manlifts in the west elevator and the east elevator due to the lack of a car enclosure on the manlift. Among other methods, one feasible method to correct this hazard would be to install a complete car enclosure on the manlift.e
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $187.50
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 1995
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $113 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $112.50
- · Z (S) $225.00
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Dec 6, 1995
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 1996
1910.219 I02
- Issued
- Dec 6, 1995
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 1996
1910.272 I01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 1995
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $188 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $187.50
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.272 I02 II
- Issued
- Dec 6, 1995
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 1996
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Dec 6, 1995
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $188 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $187.50
- · I (S) $187.50
- · Z (S) $375.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in ND
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 113324453.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.