HATTON, ND —
OSHA Inspection: SUNPRO, INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUNPRO, INCORPORATED in 61 RAILROAD WEST, HATTON, ND 58240 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 113331466.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUNPRO, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 61 RAILROAD WEST
- City
- HATTON
- State
- ND
- ZIP
- 58240
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5153
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: (a) At the east building, employees were exposed to a potential fall hazard while operating the manually operated manlift due to the lack of a complete car enclosure. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to install a complete car enclosure on the manlift. (b) At the west unit, employees were exposed to potential fall hazards while working on top of hopper cars during loading operations. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to install some type of fall protection on top of the cars (safety belts and lanyards, guardrails, or an equivalent means of protection).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.23 A08
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $240 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $240.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $450
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $450.00
- — Z (S) $450.00
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
- Penalty
- Current $180
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $180.00
- — Z (S)
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
1910.219 I02
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
1910.272 I01
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
1910.272 L04
- Issued
- Dec 23, 1996
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 1997
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in ND
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 113331466.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.