TIONESTA, PA —
OSHA Inspection: EVENFLO-CRATOR MANUFACTURING CO.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EVENFLO-CRATOR MANUFACTURING CO. in 668 ELM STREET, TIONESTA, PA 16353 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 113337299.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EVENFLO-CRATOR MANUFACTURING CO.
- Site address
- 668 ELM STREET
- City
- TIONESTA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16353
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 385, TIONESTA, PA 16353
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3089
- Employees
- 125
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,925 · Current $1,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) Standard line/Novelty Nurser Assembly Department, novelty, standard and glass lines; employees assemble bottles using component parts such as, but not limited to, disks, caps, hoods, sleeves, etc. The various steps of assembly require high hand and/or finger forces, awkward postures, high frequency/repititions. The evaluation of these tasks indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer di dnot implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989 and 1990 documented a pattern of reptitive motion injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements. 1. Worksite analysis: to recognize and identify existing cumulative trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged. 2. Medical management: which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTD's. The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of CTD cases, and should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. 3. Training and education: for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re- training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTD. A supervisors' training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the signs of CTDs and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. 4. Hazard prevention and control: which includes engineering, work practice, and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment where relevant. a. Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exosure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to ergonimic stress. b. Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonimic stressors. c. Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergnomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change of work methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the program. Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include: (i) Design tool to assist employees in assembly operations. (ii) Adjustable work tables and chairs. (iii) Automate the process, redesign the assembly operation. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP 1: Implementation of an ergonimics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3 above. STEP 2: Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in items 4a-4c. ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP 3: Implementation of administrative, work practice and engineering controls, as described in items 4a-4c above.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1700.00
- — Z (S) $1925.00
1910.134 E03
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1100.00
1910.134 E05 I
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1991
1910.134 F02 II
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 1991
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.134 F02 IV
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 1991
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1100.00
1910.333 B02 I
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 1991
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1100.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1100.00
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1991
1910.120 F05 II
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1991
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1991
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500.00
- — Z (O) $700.00
1904.5 C
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 1991
1910.20 G01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 1991
1910.20 G02
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 1991
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Sep 12, 1991
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 1991
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 113337299.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.