KANSAS CITY, KS — 1993-10-19 00:00:00

OSHA Inspection: STUART HALL COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On 1993-10-19 00:00:00, OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STUART HALL COMPANY, INC. in 1200 S. 5TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, KS 66105 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 113818801.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Stuart Hall Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Stuart Hall Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment: STUART HALL COMPANY, INC.
Site address: 1200 S. 5TH STREET
City: KANSAS CITY
State: KS
ZIP: 66105

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type: Complaint (B)
Scope: Complete (A)
Discipline: Safety
Advance notice: No
Union status: Y

When did the case open and close?

Opened: 1993-10-19 00:00:00
Closing conference: 1993-10-20 00:00:00
Case closed: 1994-01-29 00:00:00
Data loaded: 2011-10-14 16:38:47

Establishment context

NAICS code: 000000
SIC code (legacy): 4225
Employees: 43
Ownership type: A

Citations

14 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 3 exposed

Issued: Nov 17, 1993
Abate by: Nov 30, 1993
Penalty: Initial $3,150 · Current $1,575 Reduced

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to struck by hazards:
(a)  Battery Charging Area - A makeshift spreader bar used for
lifting batteries weighing
1000 to 1500 pounds on a 1-ton hoist was not load rated.  The
employees were exposed
to struck by hazards when the device broke under load.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this
hazard is to supply a spreader bar or sling that would have load
rating capacity that
would not exceed the load determined by an

Recent events (2)

1993-12-10 00:00:00 — I (S) $1575.00
1993-11-17 00:00:00 — Z (S) $3150.00

1910.38 A01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 43 exposed

Issued: Nov 17, 1993
Abate by: Dec 10, 1993
Penalty: Initial $1,350 · Current $675 Reduced

Recent events (2)

1993-12-10 00:00:00 — I (S) $675.00
1993-11-17 00:00:00 — Z (S) $1350.00

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 02 3 instances 5 exposed

Issued: Nov 17, 1993
Abate by: Dec 20, 1993
Penalty: Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced

Recent events (2)

1993-12-10 00:00:00 — I (S) $900.00
1993-11-17 00:00:00 — Z (S) $1800.00

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 02 3 instances 40 exposed

Issued: Nov 17, 1993
Abate by: Nov 23, 1993
Penalty: Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced

Recent events (2)

1993-12-10 00:00:00 — I (S) $900.00
1993-11-17 00:00:00 — Z (S) $1800.00

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 02 14 instances 40 exposed

Issued: Nov 17, 1993
Abate by: Nov 23, 1993
Penalty: Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced

Recent events (2)

1993-12-10 00:00:00 — I (S) $900.00
1993-11-17 00:00:00 — Z (S) $1800.00