ALIQUIPPA, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: PM MOORE COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PM MOORE COMPANY in INSIDE J & L TUNNEL, ALIQUIPPA, PA 15001 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 116045139.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PM MOORE COMPANY
- Site address
- INSIDE J & L TUNNEL
- City
- ALIQUIPPA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15001
- Mailing
- 112 STATION STREET, ALIQUIPPA, PA 15001
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3273
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) Procedures were inadequate for entering and cleaning the drums of the company's concrete trucks. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to develop a confined space entry program the incorporates the following items at a minimum: The following items are requirements for a class B confined space entry program: 1. Employees and supervisors were not trained in safe confined spaces entry (C.S.E.) procedures. 2. C.S.E. procedures did not include the use of a permit systems,withmanagement "sign-off" (authorization) and hazard/control checklist. 3. C.S.E. procedures did not include provisions for testing for oxygen and combustible gas/vapor levels, or monitoring the air for toxic materials. 4. There were no provisions for medical surveillance of personnel performing C.S.E. work. 5. Warning labels and safety instructional signs were not posted in the area of C.S.E. work. 6. Preparation for C.S.E. work did not include provisions to assure that ventilation was adequate, electrical equipment was safe, or that work practices were proper (special equipment or tools). 7. The use of a standby worker was not properly understood as to his function while C.S.E. work was in progress or during an emergency. 8. The drum cleaner was not provided with a safety belt. 9. There was no self contained breathing apparatus immediately available for C.S.E. emergency,nor was there an emergency rescue plan and equipment. 10. Preparation for C.S.E. did not include a check to assure that proper safety equipment was being used, such as eye protection, respiratory protection, etc. 11. There were no recordkeeping/exposure records kept on employees who did this C.S.E. work. 12. There was no initial plan for C.S.E. work. 13. There were no communications/observation for the C.S.E. work. 14. There were no written work procedures for the C.S.E. work. The following items are to be requirements of the company's class B confined space entry program if the company's qualified person determines that they are needed: 1. Atmospheric monitoring of the C.S.E. while an employee is working in the C.S. 2. Any special cleaning processes prior to entry ofthe C.S. 3. Safety equipment and clothing such as head, hearing, hand, foot, body protection for the employees who do the C.S. work. 4. Lifelines and harnessforemployees who must enter the C.S.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $875.00
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 1992
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.22 D02
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Dec 11, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400.00
- · Z (S) $525.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 116045139.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.