ST. LOUIS, MO — 1993-09-02 00:00:00

OSHA Inspection: S.A.S. CO. INC. AND SIDNEY A. SIEGFRIED

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

At a glance

On 1993-09-02 00:00:00, OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of S.A.S. CO. INC. AND SIDNEY A. SIEGFRIED in 2600 N. BROADWAY, ST. LOUIS, MO 63102 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 116104910.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch S.A.S. CO. INC. and Sidney a. Siegfried — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for S.A.S. CO. INC. and Sidney a. Siegfried is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment: S.A.S. CO. INC. AND SIDNEY A. SIEGFRIED
Site address: 2600 N. BROADWAY
City: ST. LOUIS
State: MO
ZIP: 63102

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type: Complaint (B)
Scope: Partial (B)
Discipline: Health
Advance notice: No
Union status: N

When did the case open and close?

Opened: 1993-09-02 00:00:00
Closing conference: 1993-11-02 00:00:00
Case closed: 1997-07-16 00:00:00
Data loaded: 2011-10-14 16:38:47

Establishment context

NAICS code: 000000
SIC code (legacy): 4225
Employees: 14
Ownership type: A

Citations

22 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D02

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.37 F01

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.37 G03

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.305 G01 III

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.333 A

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 1 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

1910.1200 B04 III

Serious Gravity 04 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $2,000 · Current $200 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (S) $200.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (S) $2000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the hazards of crushing and falling:
(a)For warehouseman #1, the employer did not ensure that the employee
operating
the elevator was not exposed to the hazard of falling or being crushed
while using
the elevator in an unsafe condition:
(1)The elevator has been operated with 4 of 8 missing spider bolts in the
gear case
of the drive machine, which increases the risk that the elevator could
rise or fall
in an uncontrolled manner;
(2)The elevator also had been operated with gate interlocks blocked open
creating
a hazard to the operator in that the employee could fall out during
operation of
the elevator as it passed floor openings;
(3)The elevator did not have an inner gate to protect the operator from
being caught
between the moving elevator and shaft walls;
(4)The rear car wall of the elevator was made of sheet metal welded onto
the metal
frame and had become loose.  This could present a hazard to employees if
it
should become dislodged in that the operator would have an opening of
about 1
foot to the wall that could allow them to become caught between the
elevator and
the rear shaft wall.  Employees ride the elevator with the freight as
they take it
up or down to different floors.
Abatement Note:  Refer to ANSI 17.1, dated 1971, for guidance on
correction.

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the hazards of crushing and falling:
(a)For warehouseman #2, the employer did not ensure that the employee
operating
the elevator was not exposed to the hazard of falling or being crushed
while using
the elevator in an unsafe condition:
(1)The elevator has been operated with 4 of 8 missing spider bolts in the
gear case
of the drive machine, which increases the risk that the elevator could
rise or fall
in an uncontrolled manner;
(2)The elevator also had been operated with gate interlocks blocked open
creating
a hazard to the operator in that the employee could fall out during
operation of
the elevator as it passed floor openings;
(3)The elevator did not have an inner gate to protect the operator from
being caught
between the moving elevator and shaft walls;
(4)The rear car wall of the elevator was made of sheet metal welded onto
the metal
frame and had become loose.  This could present a hazard to employees if
it
should become dislodged in that the operator would have an opening of
about 1
foot to the wall that could allow them to become caught between the
elevator and
the rear shaft wall.  Employees ride the elevator with the freight as
they take it
up or down to different floors.
Abatement Note:  Refer to ANSI 17.1, dated 1971, for guidance on
correction.

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1996
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the hazards of crushing and falling:
(a)For warehouseman #3, the employer did not ensure that the employee
operating
the elevator was not exposed to the hazard of falling or being crushed
while using
the elevator in an unsafe condition:
(1)The elevator has been operated with 4 of 8 missing spider bolts in the
gear case
of the drive machine, which increases the risk that the elevator could
rise or fall
in an uncontrolled manner;
(2)The elevator also had been operated with gate interlocks blocked open
creating
a hazard to the operator in that the employee could fall out during
operation of
the elevator as it passed floor openings;
(3)The elevator did not have an inner gate to protect the operator from
being caught
between the moving elevator and shaft walls;
(4)The rear car wall of the elevator was made of sheet metal welded onto
the metal
frame and had become loose.  This could present a hazard to employees if
it
should become dislodged in that the operator would have an opening of
about 1
foot to the wall that could allow them to become caught between the
elevator and
the rear shaft wall.  Employees ride the elevator with the freight as
they take it
up or down to different floors.
Abatement Note:  Refer to ANSI 17.1, dated 1971, for guidance on

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

General-duty citation text

Section
5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the hazards of crushing and falling:
(a)For warehouseman #4, the employer did not ensure that the employee
operating
the elevator was not exposed to the hazard of falling or being crushed
while using
the elevator in an unsafe condition:
(1)The elevator has been operated with 4 of 8 missing spider bolts in the
gear case
of the drive machine, which increases the risk that the elevator could
rise or fall
in an uncontrolled manner;
(2)The elevator also had been operated with gate interlocks blocked open
creating
a hazard to the operator in that the employee could fall out during
operation of
the elevator as it passed floor openings;
(3)The elevator did not have an inner gate to protect the operator from
being caught
between the moving elevator and shaft walls;
(4)The rear car wall of the elevator was made of sheet metal welded onto
the metal
frame and had become loose.  This could present a hazard to employees if
it
should become dislodged in that the operator would have an opening of
about 1
foot to the wall that could allow them to become caught between the
elevator and
the rear shaft wall.  Employees ride the elevator with the freight as
they take it
up or down to different floors.
Abatement Note:  Refer to ANSI 17.1, dated 1971, for guidance on

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

General-duty citation text

Section
5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the hazards of crushing and falling:
(a)For warehouseman #5, the employer did not ensure that the employee
operating
the elevator was not exposed to the hazard of falling or being crushed
while using
the elevator in an unsafe condition:
(1)The elevator has been operated with 4 of 8 missing spider bolts in the
gear case
of the drive machine, which increases the risk that the elevator could
rise or fall
in an uncontrolled manner;
(2)The elevator also had been operated with gate interlocks blocked open
creating
a hazard to the operator in that the employee could fall out during
operation of
the elevator as it passed floor openings;
(3)The elevator did not have an inner gate to protect the operator from
being caught
between the moving elevator and shaft walls;
(4)The rear car wall of the elevator was made of sheet metal welded onto
the metal
frame and had become loose.  This could present a hazard to employees if
it
should become dislodged in that the operator would have an opening of
about 1
foot to the wall that could allow them to become caught between the
elevator and
the rear shaft wall.  Employees ride the elevator with the freight as
they take it
up or down to different floors.
Abatement Note:  Refer to ANSI 17.1, dated 1971, for guidance on

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

1910.23 C01

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

1910.23 C01

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

1910.23 C01

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

1910.37 K02

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

1910.37 K02

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

1910.37 K02

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1000.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

1910.37 K02

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Penalty: Initial $33,000 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (W) $1100.00
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (W) $33000.00

1904.2 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 4 exposed

Issued: Mar 1, 1994
Abate by: Nov 15, 1995
Emphasis program: X

Recent events (2)

1996-02-20 00:00:00 — F (O)
1994-03-01 00:00:00 — Z (O)

More inspections at S.A.S. CO. INC. and Sidney a. Siegfried

May 30, 1996 ST. LOUIS, MO

View S.A.S. CO. INC. and Sidney a. Siegfried's full OSHA safety record →

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)

Jan 5, 2012 Bruce D. Bowman · SCHENECTADY, NY Jan 25, 2005 KGC, INC. · BILLINGS, MT Dec 31, 2002 Rockaway Borough DPW · ROCKAWAY, NJ Dec 31, 2002 Harry Brickey DBA a. Brickey Ceiling Company · FOREST CITY, NC Dec 31, 2002 Sudden Bond Industries · EDGERTON, KS

More inspections in MO

Jul 17, 2026 United Parcel Service · SAINT LOUIS, MO Jul 15, 2026 Triple J Construction, LLC. · PLATTE CITY, MO Jul 14, 2026 Torchylo Builders, LLC. · CLINTON, MO Jul 13, 2026 Jorge Merida · BLUE SPRINGS, MO Jul 9, 2026 Niagara Bottling · KANSAS CITY, MO

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 116104910.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.