Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: S.W. JACK DRILLING

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of S.W. JACK DRILLING in CROOK #1, PULLMAN, WV 26512 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 116523382.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch S.W. Jack Drilling — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for S.W. Jack Drilling is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
S.W. JACK DRILLING
Site address
CROOK #1
City
PULLMAN
State
WV
ZIP
26512
Mailing
POST OFFICE BOX 48, BUCKHANNON, WV 26201
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
Yes
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1381
Employees
115
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Construction safety.

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 26, 1999
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to a struck by hazard:
a.Employees were not sufficiently trained to follow the company's Blowout
Prevention Control Procedures in that four employees on Rig #7 were exposed
to the hazards of being struck by a configuration of a sudden, violent
released
of pressurized air from the gas well and the blowout preventer, and (it's
believed) by part of the flowline that was connected to the airbowl of the
Blowout Preventer.  The employees did not control the sudden, violently
release of pressure by immediately closing off the blowout preventer,
before
working on the flowline, as specified in Chapter I, Section F, Sub-section
1c,
of the company (The Jack Company and the S.W. Jack Drilling Company)
safety manual.  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement
method to correct this hazard would be to establish and implement
sufficient
training which would properly and adequately prepare employees to recognize
and respond to unusual drilling and well control situations, therefore
prohibiting carless acts such as , but not limited to, employees not
closing
down the blowout preventer, while working on a clogged flowline on a hole
that was under extremely high pressure, as specified by Chapter I, Section
F,
Sub-section 1c, page 15 of the company (The Jack Company and the S.W.
Jack Drilling Company) safety manual.  This training should require
continuous observation of all employees work performance in a safe and
effective manner.   This alleged condition occurred on September 23, 1998.
b.Four employees on Rig #7 were exposed to the hazards of being struck by a
configuration of a sudden, violent released of pressurized air from the
gas well
and the blowout preventer, and (it's believed by part of the flowline that
was
connected to the airbowl of the Blowout Preventer, in that the employees
did
not control the sudden, violently release of pressure by immediately
closing off
the blowout preventer, before working on the flowline, as specified in
Chapter
1, Section F, Sub-section 1c, of the company (The Jack Company and the
S.W. Jack Drilling Company) safety manual.  Among other methods, one
feasible and acceptance abatement method to correct this hazard would be to
ensure that the Blowout Preventer is closed before working on the flowline.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $4900.00

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 14, 1999
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1050.00
  • — Z (S) $1050.00

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 01 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 14, 1999
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1050.00
  • — Z (S) $1050.00

1910.24 H

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 14, 1999
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1050.00
  • — Z (S) $1050.00

1910.24 C

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 14, 1999
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.151 B

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 26, 1999
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1050.00
  • — Z (S) $1050.00

1910.184 E03 II

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 21, 1999
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1050.00
  • — Z (S) $1050.00

1910.184 E02 I

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 21, 1999
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.157 G03

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 14, 1999
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1050.00
  • — Z (S) $1050.00

1910.38 A01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 1999
Abate by
Jan 29, 1999
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 116523382.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.