PULLMAN, WV —
OSHA Inspection: S.W. JACK DRILLING
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of S.W. JACK DRILLING in CROOK #1, PULLMAN, WV 26512 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 116523382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- S.W. JACK DRILLING
- Site address
- CROOK #1
- City
- PULLMAN
- State
- WV
- ZIP
- 26512
- Mailing
- POST OFFICE BOX 48, BUCKHANNON, WV 26201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1381
- Employees
- 115
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 26, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck by hazard: a.Employees were not sufficiently trained to follow the company's Blowout Prevention Control Procedures in that four employees on Rig #7 were exposed to the hazards of being struck by a configuration of a sudden, violent released of pressurized air from the gas well and the blowout preventer, and (it's believed) by part of the flowline that was connected to the airbowl of the Blowout Preventer. The employees did not control the sudden, violently release of pressure by immediately closing off the blowout preventer, before working on the flowline, as specified in Chapter I, Section F, Sub-section 1c, of the company (The Jack Company and the S.W. Jack Drilling Company) safety manual. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to establish and implement sufficient training which would properly and adequately prepare employees to recognize and respond to unusual drilling and well control situations, therefore prohibiting carless acts such as , but not limited to, employees not closing down the blowout preventer, while working on a clogged flowline on a hole that was under extremely high pressure, as specified by Chapter I, Section F, Sub-section 1c, page 15 of the company (The Jack Company and the S.W. Jack Drilling Company) safety manual. This training should require continuous observation of all employees work performance in a safe and effective manner. This alleged condition occurred on September 23, 1998. b.Four employees on Rig #7 were exposed to the hazards of being struck by a configuration of a sudden, violent released of pressurized air from the gas well and the blowout preventer, and (it's believed by part of the flowline that was connected to the airbowl of the Blowout Preventer, in that the employees did not control the sudden, violently release of pressure by immediately closing off the blowout preventer, before working on the flowline, as specified in Chapter 1, Section F, Sub-section 1c, of the company (The Jack Company and the S.W. Jack Drilling Company) safety manual. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptance abatement method to correct this hazard would be to ensure that the Blowout Preventer is closed before working on the flowline.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4900.00
- — Z (S) $4900.00
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.24 C
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 26, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.184 E03 II
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.184 E02 I
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.157 G03
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $1,050
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.38 A01
- Issued
- Jan 11, 1999
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in WV
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 116523382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.