LANGHORNE, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: REEDMAN AUTOMOBILE
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of REEDMAN AUTOMOBILE in US ROUTE 1, LANGHORNE, PA 19047 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 122027030.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- REEDMAN AUTOMOBILE
- Site address
- US ROUTE 1
- City
- LANGHORNE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19047
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 3004, LANGHORNE, PA 19047
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5511
- Employees
- 99
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 29, 1997
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falling loads: a) An employee, mechanic, was performing service work under an automobiles in the bay number 5 of the Jaguar Service Center. The car was suspended by a Globe model FSN-28 lift. The safety device for preventing the lift from dropping in the advent of a hydraulic system failure was not functioning thus exposing employees to injury from being struck by falling loads. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide an automatic mechanical device to hold the lift in the fully extended position at rated load capacity.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- May 29, 1997
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $562 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $562.00
- · Z (S) $1125.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- May 29, 1997
- Abate by
- Aug 18, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $938 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $938.00
- · Z (S) $1875.00
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 29, 1997
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 1997
1910.132 F04
- Issued
- May 29, 1997
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 1997
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- May 29, 1997
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 1997
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- May 29, 1997
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 1997
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- May 29, 1997
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 1997
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 122027030.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.