Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: REEDMAN AUTOMOBILE

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of REEDMAN AUTOMOBILE in US ROUTE 1, LANGHORNE, PA 19047 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 122027030.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reedman Automobile for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reedman Automobile is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
REEDMAN AUTOMOBILE
Site address
US ROUTE 1
City
LANGHORNE
State
PA
ZIP
19047
Mailing
P.O. BOX 3004, LANGHORNE, PA 19047
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
5511
Employees
99
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 1997
Abate by
Jul 1, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to falling loads:
a)  An employee, mechanic, was performing service work under an
automobiles in the
bay number 5 of the Jaguar Service Center.  The car was suspended by a
Globe model
FSN-28 lift.  The safety device for preventing the lift from dropping in
the advent of a
hydraulic system failure was not functioning thus exposing employees to
injury from
being struck by falling loads.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is
to provide an automatic mechanical device to hold the lift in the fully
extended position at rated
load capacity.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $1500.00

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 01 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 29, 1997
Abate by
Jun 30, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,125 · Current $562 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $562.00
  • · Z (S) $1125.00

1910.307 B

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
May 29, 1997
Abate by
Aug 18, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,875 · Current $938 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $938.00
  • · Z (S) $1875.00

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 1997
Abate by
Jul 1, 1997

1910.132 F04

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 29, 1997
Abate by
Jul 1, 1997

1910.147 C01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 1997
Abate by
Jul 1, 1997

1910.157 G02

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
May 29, 1997
Abate by
Jul 18, 1997
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 1997
Abate by
Jun 6, 1997
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 122027030.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.