OSHA Inspection: INLAND FISHER GUIDE, DIV. OF GENERAL MOTOR CORP.

Issued

Dec 20, 1993

Abate by

Jun 3, 1994

General-duty citation text

was not performed.
aa.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working  in Department 1 performing the job described as rough polish (150
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
grit) was
not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months
of job
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by January 13,
1994, for the
job, ID number 0028, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
bb.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
employer did not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within sixmonths as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement
Agreement, in that the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as hand sanding was
not given
the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of job
analysis.  Job
modification was to have been implemented by January 13, 1994, for the
job, ID number 0029, nor did the company document the reason that
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
cc.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated
within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
recognized hazards that
working in Department 1 performing the job described as packing door
frames was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 13, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0030, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
dd.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physcial harm to
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
employees in that employees
were exposed to:Citation 1 Item 1
On November 19, 1990, the Occupational safety and Health Administration,
United States
Department of Labor, General Motors Corporation and the United Auto
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as double miter saw
was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Workers of America
Job modification was to have been implemented by February 4, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0031, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
ee.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
entered into an agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") settling citations
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as robot welder was
not given the
ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of job
analysis.  Job
modification was to have been implemented by February 5, 1994, for the
job, ID number
0032, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
issued by OSHA to GM
was not
performed.
ff.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as rough polish - 100
facilities for violations of Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety
grit was notgiven the ergonomic job modification of job rotation  within
six months of job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by February 9, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0033, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
gg.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made
and Health Act of 1970,
a
OSHRC Docket No. 90-410 and 90-919.  GM agreed to settle the matters and
to abate the cited
conditions by instituting a corporate wide program to seek out and correct
similar hazards in
other establishments, and to implement a comprehensive program relating to
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as rough polish - 150
grit was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation  within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by February 9, 1994, for the
ergonomic hazards
job, ID
number 0034, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
hh.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4
found in those establishments.  The Agreement became final order of the
of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that the APO working in
Department
1
performing the job described as hand sanding was not given the ergonomic
job
modification of job rotation within six months of job analysis.  Job
modification was to
have been implemented by February 9, 1994, for the job, ID number 0035,
nor did the
company document the reason that ergonomic job modification was not
Occupational safety
performed.
ii.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as packing door
frames was not
and Health Review Commission.
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by February 9, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0036, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
jj.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
In monitoring GM's performance under the Agreement, OSHA has determined
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
that GM failed
to abate and comply with various provisions of the agreement in good faith
and/or certain
provisions were not being reasonably addressed at the Inland Fisher Guide
facility as follows
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as miter saw, two
presses was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by February 11, 1994, for
the job, IDnumber 0037, nor did the company document the reason that
(each allegation is preceded by a reference to the section and the page of
ergonomic job modification
was not performed.
kk.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as MIG welder, trim
the Agreement, and
press was
not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and opti-touch
controls
installation within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to
have been
implemented by February 11, 1994, for the job, ID number 0038, nor did the
company
document the reason that ergonomic job modification was not performed.
ll.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
the specific requirement breached by the facility):
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the
APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as header miter saw,
two presses
was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six
months of job
a.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February 11,
1994, for the
job, ID number 0039, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
mm.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
the APO
working in Department 1  performing the job described as polishes reveal
surfaces of
door frame was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation
within six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
February 13,
1994, for the job, ID number 0040, nor did the company document the reason
that
working in Department  1 performing the job described as saw and two punch
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
nn.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as grinds door frames
was not
presses
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February
13, 1994, for the
job, ID number 0041, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
oo.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as grind door frames
on 100 grit
wheel (A) was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation
within six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
February 16,
1994, for the job, ID number 0042, nor did the company document the reason
months of job
that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
pp.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as grind door frames
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by December 30,
on 100 grit
1993, for
the job, ID number 0002, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic
job
wheel (B) was not given the ergonomic job modification of  job rotation
within six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
February 16,
1994, for the job, ID number 0043, nor did the company document the reason
that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
qq.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as 150 grit a body
rear
R.H. was
not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months
of job
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February 17,
1994, for the
job, ID number 0046, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
rr.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as coupe, 80 grit
polish after flash
weld was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation  within
six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February
23, 1994, forthe job, ID number 0047, nor did the company document the
reason
that ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
ss.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as coupe, 80 grit
polish after
rotary welder was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation
within six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
February 23, 1994 , for the job, ID number 0048, nor did the company
document the
reason that ergonomic job modification was not performed.
tt.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made
a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as coupe, R.H. 150
grit was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by February 23, 1994, for
the job, ID
number 0049, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
uu.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as A body front, 80
grit after
flash was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within
six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February
23,1994, for
the job, ID number 0050, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
vv.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as A body front, 80
grit after
rotary was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within
six months
of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
February
24, 1994,
for the job, ID number 0051, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic
job modification was not performed.ww.  Section 4.0Implementation of
Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as A body front, LH
150 grit was
not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months
of job
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February 24,
1994, for the
job, ID number 0052, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
xx.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as auto tapper was
not given the
ergonomic job modification of job rotation and platforms within six months
of job
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February 28,
1994, for the
job, ID number 0053, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
yy.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4
of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that the APO working in
Department 3
performing the job described as peen rivet and lever to frame was not
given the
ergonomic job modification of job rotation and
platforms within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have
been
implemented by February 28, 1994, for the job, ID number 0054, nor did the
company
document the reason that ergonomic job modification was not performed.
zz.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described  as sub assembly,
rivet, forkbolt
was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and platforms
within
six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
February 28,
1994, for the job, ID number 0055, nor did the company document the reason
that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
aaa.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10  For employees
of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as assemble springs
and rubber
silencer was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and
platforms
within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been
implemented by
February 28, 1994, for the job, ID number 0056, nor did the company
document the
reason that ergonomic job modification was not performed.
bbb.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as peen S/A and frame
was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and platforms within
six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February
28, 1994, for
the job, ID number 0057, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
ccc.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated
within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as rivet lever
assembly was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and platforms within
six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February
28, 1994, for
the job, ID number 0058, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
ddd.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as install spring to
tailgate was
not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and platforms
within six months
of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
February 28, 1994,
for the job, ID number 0059, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic
job modification was not performed.
eee.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within sixmonths as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement
Agreement, in that the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as weld stud to
tailgate was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and platforms within
six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by February
28, 1994, for
the job, ID number 0060, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
fff.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as assemble block-out
plug was
not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and platforms
modification was not performed.
within six months
of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by March
1, 1994, for
the job, ID number 0061, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
ggg.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made
a
b.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as install switch and
test was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by March 1,1 994, for the
job, ID
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
number 0063, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
hhh.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
made a
working in Department 3 performing the job described as put clips on
levers was not
given the ergonomic job modification of revision of sheet metal panels
within six months
of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by March
1, 1994, for
the job, ID number 0064, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
iii.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as miter saw for
pillars and
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spin rivet and
lever on bracketwas not given the ergonomic job modification of basket
elevation within six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by March 7,
headers was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation
1994, for the
job, ID number 0068, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
jjj.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
within six months
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job
described as push button/backplate assembly was not given the ergonomic job
modification of a new W.O.M. set up within six months of job analysis.  Job
modification was to have been implemented by March 8, 1994, for the job,
ID number
0070.
kkk.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spin rivet,
forkbolt, and frame
was not given the ergonomic job modification of replacement of palm
buttons with
optitouch
within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have
December 29, 1993,
been
implemented by March 10, 1994, for the job, ID number 0072.
lll.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spin frame, rivet
for the job, ID number 0003, nor did the company document the reason that
and lever was
ergonomic
job modification was not performed.
c.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
not given the ergonomic job modification of replacement of palm buttons
with
opti-touch
within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been
implemented by
March 10, 1994, for the job, ID number 0073.
mmm.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as  spin frame, two
rivets, washer
and two levers was not given the ergonomic job modification of replacement
of palm
buttons with opti-touch within six months of job analysis.  Job
modification was to have
abated within sixmonths as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement
been implemented by March 10,1994, for the job, ID number 0074.
nnn.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made
a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as assemble spring
Agreement, in that the APO
was not given
the ergonomic job modification of revision of springing tool handle within
six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by march 10,
1994, for
the job, ID number 0075.
ooo.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
working in Department 1 performing the job described as miter saw and two
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as mech. check
fixture was not
given the ergonomic job modification of replacement of palm buttons with
opti-touch
within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been
implemented by
March 10, 1994, for the job, ID number 0076.
punch
ppp.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
presses was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation
within six months
of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
December 30, 1993,
for the job, ID number 0004, nor did the company document the reason that
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spinner was not
given the
ergonomic job modification of replacement of palm buttons with opti-touch
ergonomic
within
six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented
by March
15, 1994, for the job, ID number 0079, nor did the company document the
reason that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
qqq.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
job modification was not performed.
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spinner was not
given the
ergonomic job modification of replacement of palm buttons with opti-touch
within six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
March 15,
1994, for the job, ID number 0080, nor did the company document the reason
d.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
rrr.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within sixmonths as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement
Agreement, in that the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spinner was not
given the
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
ergonomic job modification of replacement of palm buttons with opti-touch
within six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
March 15,
1994, for the job, ID number 0081, nor did the company document the reason
that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
sss.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as MIG welds bracket
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spring assembly
was not given
the ergonomic job modification of tool revision and job rotation within
six months of job
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by March 15,
1994, for the
on header
job, ID number 0082, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
ttt.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six
working in Department 3 performing the job described as screw gun and pack
was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and tool revision
within six months
of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by March
15, 1994, for
the job, ID number 0083, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic
job
modification was not performed.
months of job
uuu.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spinner was not
given the
ergonomic job modification of installation of touch controls within six
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by January 1,
months of job
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by March 20,
1994, for the
job, ID number 0089.
vvv.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated
within six
1994, for the
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
job, ID number 0005, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
e.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spinner was not
given the
ergonomic job modification of installation of touch sensor palm buttons
within sixmonths of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been
implemented by March 15,
1994, for the job, ID number 0090.
www.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spring assembly
was not given
the ergonomic job modification of tool revision within six months of job
analysis.  Job
modification was to have been implemented by March 20, 1994, for the job,
ID
number
0091, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification was not
performed.
xxx.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 3 performing the job described as spring assembly
was not given
the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of job
analysis.  Job
modification was to have been implemented by March 20, 1994, for the job,
ID number
0092, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification was not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as robot welder was
not given the
ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of job
analysis.  Job
modification was to have been implemented by January 1, 1993, for the job,
ID
number
0006, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification was not
performed.
f.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as MIG weld bracket
and press
was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation and palm
button
replacement within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to
have been
implemented by January 1, 1994, for the job, ID number 0007, nor did the
company
document the reason that ergonomic job modification was not performed.
g.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as rough polish 100
grit was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis. Job modification was to have been implemented by January 2,
1994, for the job, ID
number 0008, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
h.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the
APO
working in Department 1  performing the job described as rough polish 150
grit was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 2, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0009, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
i.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1  performing the job described as hand sand was not
given the
ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of job
analysis.  Job
modification was to have been implemented by January 2, 1994, for the job,
ID number
0010, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification was not
performed.
j.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as pack door frames
was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 6, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0011, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
k.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as saw and two
presses was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation  within six months of
job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by January
7, 1994, for the job, ID number 0012, nor did the company document the
reason that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
l.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the
APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as MIG welder and two
presses
was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six
months of job
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by January 7,
1994, for the
job, ID number 0013, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
m.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as double miter saw
was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation  within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 7, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0014, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
n.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as robotic welder was
not given
the ergonomic job modification of palm button replacement and job rotation
within six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
January 7,
1994, for the job, ID number 0015, nor did the company document the reason
that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
o.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as 100 grit rough
polish was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 12,1994, for the
job, ID
number 0016, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.p.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg.
10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated
within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as 150 grit rough
polish was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 12,1994, for the
job, ID
number 0017, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
q.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4
of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that the APO working in
Department 1
performing the job described as hand sand was not given the ergonomic job
modification
of job rotation within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was
to have been
implemented by January 12, 1994, for the job, ID number 0018, nor did the
company
document the reason that ergonomic job modification was not performed.
r.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as pack was not given
the
ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of job
analysis.  Job
modification was to have been implemented by January 12, 1994, for the
job, ID number
0019, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification was not
performed.
s.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as pierce machine,
two presses
was not given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation  within six
months of job
analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by January 12,
1994, for the
job, ID number 0020, nor did the company document the reason that
ergonomic job
modification was not performed.
t.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as miter saw, two
presses was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 13, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0021, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
u.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as trim press, mig
weld
was not
given the ergonomic job modification of palm button replacement and job
rotation within
six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented
by January
13,1 994, for the job, ID number 0022, nor did the company document the
reason that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
v.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as miter saw, two
presses was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 13, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0023, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
w.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as trim, MIG weld was
not given
the ergonomic job modification of palm button replacement and job rotation
within six months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been
implemented by
January 13, 1994, for the job, ID number 0024, nor did the company
document the
reason that ergonomic job modification was not performed.
x.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as double miter saw,
trim was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 13,1994, for the
job, ID
number 0025, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification
was not performed.
y.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as robot welder was
not given the
ergonomic job modification of palm button replacement and job rotation
within six
months of job analysis.  Job modification was to have been implemented by
January 13,
1994, for the job, ID number 0026, nor did the company document the reason
that
ergonomic job modification was not performed.
z.  Section 4.0Implementation of Corrected MeasuresPg. 10
For employees of the company, as of March 22, 1994, the employer had not
made a
good faith effort to ensure that identified ergonomic hazards had been
abated within six
months as per Section 4.4 of the Corporate Settlement Agreement, in that
the APO
working in Department 1 performing the job described as rough polish (100
grit) was not
given the ergonomic job modification of job rotation within six months of
job
analysis.
Job modification was to have been implemented by January 13, 1994, for the
job, ID
number 0027, nor did the company document the reason that ergonomic job
modification