BRIDGEPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ANTHONY JULIAN RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ANTHONY JULIAN RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. in BROAD STREET AT CANNON STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123164956.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANTHONY JULIAN RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
- Site address
- BROAD STREET AT CANNON STREET
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06604
- Mailing
- 514 GRAND STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1623
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- May 5, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential hazards of oxygen deficient, toxic, or explosive atmospheres when entering confined spaces without observing adequate entry procedures: COMPANY: The company did not develop and implement a Confined Space Entry program or procedures for workers required to enter newly constructed sewer man hole(s) to complete the construction: Among others, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard would be to develop a written program along with establishing standard procedures for safe entry into sewer man holes as well as other confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $3000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- May 5, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential hazards of oxygen deficient, toxic, or explosive atmospheres when entering confined spaces without observing adequate entry procedures: COMPANY: Workers were exposed to potentially dangerous atmospheres when allowed to enter into sewer lines where adequate testing had not been performed and appropriate personal protective equipment had not been provided. Among others, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard would be to establishing standard procedures for the continuous monitoring of sewer man holes as well as other confined spaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $3000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- May 5, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential hazards of oxygen deficient, toxic, or explosive atmospheres when entering confined spaces without observing adequate entry procedures: COMPANY: The company did not ensure that each worker was provided with and trained to properly use the personal protective equipment and rescue equipment for making rescues from permit spaces: Among others, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard would be to provide the necessary equipment, along with establishing standard procedures and training for it's use, care and maintenance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $3000.00
1926.21 B06 I
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- May 5, 1997
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1926.202
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $100.00
- — Z (R) $200.00
1926.200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $600.00
- — Z (R) $1200.00
1926.28 A
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 1997
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1926.500 B06
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1997
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 1997
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Anthony Julian Railroad Construction CO., INC.
View Anthony Julian Railroad Construction CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 123164956.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.