WATERBURY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MACDERMID INCORPORATION
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of MACDERMID INCORPORATION in 526 HUNTINGDON AVE, WATERBURY, CT 06708 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123172561.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MACDERMID INCORPORATION
- Site address
- 526 HUNTINGDON AVE
- City
- WATERBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06708
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2819
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 12, 1994
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625 · Current $813 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the batch blending process chemical fire and explosion of MACro Alum #5 a component mixture of Sodium Fluoroborate, Mono Sodium Phosphate, Potassium Ferricyanide, and Chromic acid Flake: MacDermid, Incorporation, 526 Huntington Ave.,Waterbury, CT: Employees were exposed to hazard of the batch blending process chemical fire and explosion of MACro Alum #5 a component mixture of Sodium Fluoroborate, Mono Sodium Phosphate, Potassium Ferricyanide, and Chromic acid Flake. Employees were operating the process without the benefit of adequate operating procedures and training. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the design and implementation of operating procedures and training which shall include the following: I Operating procedures: (1) The employer shall develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in the MACro Alum #5 process consistent with the process safety information and shall address at least the following elements: (i) Steps for each operating phase: (A) Initial startup; (B) Normal operations; (C) Temporary operations; (D) Emergency shutdown including the conditions under which emergency shutdown is required, and the assignment of shutdown responsibility to qualified operators to ensure that emergency shutdown is executed in a safe and timely manner. (E) Emergency Operations; (F) Normal shutdown; and, (G) Startup following a turnaround, or after an emergency shutdown. (ii) Operating limits: (A) Consequences of deviation; and (B) Steps required to correct or avoid deviation. (iii) Safety and health considerations: (A) Properties of, and hazards presented by, the chemicals used in the process; with particular attention to MSDS information, process perturbations and/or incidents, and investigations on the hazards of the chemicals; (B) Precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including engineering controls administrative controls, and personal protective equipment; (C) Control measures to be taken if physical contact or airborne exposure occurs; (D) Quality control for raw materials and control of hazardous chemical inventory levels; and, (E) Any special or unique hazards. (iv) Safety systems and their functions. (2)Operating procedures shall be readily accessible to employees who work in or maintain a process. (3) The operating procedures shall be reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflect current operating practice, including changes that result from changes in process chemicals, technology, and equipment, and changes to facilities. The employer shall certify annually that these operating procedures are current and accurate. (4) The employer shall develop and implement safe work practices to provide for the control of hazards during operations such as lockout/tagout; confined space entry; opening process equipment or piping; and control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel. These safe work practices shall apply to employees and contractor employees. II Training: (1) Initial training: (i)Each employee presently involved in operating a process, and each employee before being involved in operating a newly assigned process, shall be trained in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures as specified above. The training shall include emphasis on the specific safety and health hazards, emergency operations including shutdown, and safe work practices applicable to the employee's job tasks. (ii)In lieu of initial training for those employees already involved in operating a process, an employer may certify in writing that the employee has the required knowledge, skills, and abilities to safely carry out the duties and responsibilities as specified in the operating procedures. (2) Refresher training shall be provided at least every three years, and more often if necessary, to each employee involved in operating a process to assure that the employee understands and adheres to the current operating procedures of the process. The employer, in consultation with the employees involved in operating the process, shall determine the appropriate frequency of refresher training. (3) The employer shall ascertain that each employee involved in operating a process has received and understood the training required by this paragraph. The employer shall prepare a record which contains the identity of the employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $812.50
- — Z (S) $1625.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 123172561.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.