LANCASTER, PA —
OSHA Inspection: KUNZLER & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KUNZLER & COMPANY, INCORPORATED in 640-662 MANOR STREET, LANCASTER, PA 17604 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123186686.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KUNZLER & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 640-662 MANOR STREET
- City
- LANCASTER
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 17604
- Mailing
- 640-662 MANOR STREET, P.O. BOX 4747, LANCASTER, PA 17604
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2013
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 29, 1995
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625 · Current $1,625
8301
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform lifting tasks resulting in stresses that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries: (a)Packing Department - The Peeler employees performing the oven unloading task The evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such injuries. The injury and illness records for 1993, and 1994 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. (b)Packing Department - The Peeler employees loading the hot dog rods onto the upper space on storage racks - The evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such injuries. The injury and illness records for 1993, and 1994 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements: (1)Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing manual lifting hazards in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged through a mechanism such as a safety program. (2)Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of manual lifting injuries. The program should address recognition, evaluation, treatment, and referral of lifting injury cases. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. (3)Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of manual material handling, and how to prevent lifting injuries. A supervisors' training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of manual lifting hazards, and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. (4)Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practices, and administrative controls. (a)Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of manual lifting hazards. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, multiple person lifts, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. (b)Work practice controls are implemented which included proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, proper placement of loads, and reduction of weight lifted. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: i)Require workers to participate in a fitness and exercise program providing time for flexibility and warmup before beginning work, and have stretch exercise periods at mid-morning and mid-afternoon of the workday. ii)Workers should be trained to remove only one (1) Hot Dog Rod at a time from the Oven. (c)Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and use of mechanical lifting aids. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include: i)Develop and install an extension to the top line of the oven which would lower the hot dog rods to near shoulder height prior to removal by the employee. ii)Reduce the number of hot dogs on each rod to reduce the weight being lifted. iii)Develop and install an alternate type of storage rack which does not require the employees to decrease the reach distance. Step 1 -Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-4 above. Step 2 -Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement, outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in items 4(a) - 4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. Step 3 -Implementation of administrative, work practices and engineering controls, as described in items 4(a) - 4(c), above. Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 1 08/31/95 Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 2 09/30/95 Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 3 12/29/95
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1625.00
- — Z (S) $1625.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 27, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 1996
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625 · Current $150 Reduced
8302
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform tasks involving repetitive motion resulting in stresses that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: (a)Packing Department - The employees performing the Loader Operator tasks of sorting "bad" hot dogs and replacing them with "good" hot dogs - The evaluation of this task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1993, 1994, documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements: (1)Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing cumulative trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encouraged. (2)Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of Cumulative Trauma Disorders (CTD). The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of CTD and Lifting Injury cases, should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. (3)Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Re-training should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of CTDs. A supervisors' training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the signs of CTDs, and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. (4)Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practices, and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment were relevant. (a)Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to ergonomic stress. (b)Work practice controls are implemented which included proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: i)Require workers to participate in a fitness and exercise program providing time for flexibility and warmup before beginning work, and have stretch exercise periods at mid-morning and mid-afternoon of the workday. ii)Instruct employees in the adjustment of the workstation, their features, and advantages. Encourage workers to become proficient in making rapid adjustments to the workstation to fit their body at the start of the workshift. Encourage the workers to make adjustments of the workstations during the workday to reduce muscle fatigue. iii)Workers should be trained in the use of minimum finger force, and the need to keep the wrist in a flat neutral position while changing the hot dogs. (c)Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change of work methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include: i)Install adjustable work platforms to allow for varying sizes of employees. The work platform should be adjustable to the height in which employees elbows are at approximately 90 degrees. ii)Install a sort station on each side of the double conveyor line to eliminate the throwing of "bad" hot dogs. Therefore the frequency of repetitions is reduced, as well as, the reach distance is reduced. Incorporate in the design a "good" hot dog bin and "bad" hot dog bin on the side of the line closest to the employee. These bins should be at the same level as the conveyor belt and the entry to the bins should be smooth. Step 1 -Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-4 above. Step 2 -Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement, outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in items 4(a) - 4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. Step 3 -Implementation of administrative, work practices and engineering controls, as described in items 4(a) - 4(c), above. Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 1 08/31/95 Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 2 09/30/95 Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 3 12/29/95
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $150.00
- — Z (S) $1625.00
More inspections at Kunzler & Company, Incorporated
View Kunzler & Company, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 123186686.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.