HATFIELD, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: EASTERN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SYSTEMS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EASTERN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SYSTEMS in 3030 UNIONVILLE PIKE, HATFIELD, PA 19440 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123259319.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EASTERN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SYSTEMS
- Site address
- 3030 UNIONVILLE PIKE
- City
- HATFIELD
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19440
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 308, HATFIELD, PA 19440
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3272
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
94 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a crushing or amputation hazard from falling onto the moving conveyor belt. a) Batch Plant - The employee must stand close to and lean over a conveyor belt to dump fiberglass and microsilicas onto the belt and no alarm or visual device is provided to alert the employee to the starting conveyor. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install a warning device. ABATEMENT NOTE: The warning device shall be actuated by the controller device starting the conveyor and shall continue for a required period of time before the conveyor starts. A flashing light or similar visual warning device may be used in conjunction with or in place of the audible device if more effective in particular circumstances. X\ y y m "T
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (S) $7000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to broken bones or death from a falling load. a) Steel Shop - The North American Industry five (5) ton underhung crane had a homemade below the hook lifting device that was not proof tested, the chain slings were not alloy steel, and the load was connected to the slings with Covert Snaps that are not approved for overhead lifting, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. b) Yard - The manitowok truck crane, Serial Number 29209, had wire rope clips on backwards where the boom line attaches to the saddle. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to follow the appropriate national or manufacturers specifications. ABATEMENT NOTE: The following standards should be followed: American National Standard, Below the Hook Lifting Device, B30.20 Chapter 20-1. Section 20-1.2 Markings (a) The rated load of the lifting device shall be marked on the main structure where it is visible. (b) A nameplate or other permanent marking shall be affixed displaying the following information: (1) Manufacturer's name (2) Serial number (3) Lifter weight, if over 100 lb (45kg) (4) Rated load Section 20-1.3.1 Inspection (a) Frequent, daily visual with no record. (b) Periodic, yearly inspection of external condition with a record. Section 20-1.4.2 Rated Load Test (a) Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified, or repaired lifting devices should be tested and inspected by or under the direction of a qualified person and a written report be furnished by such a person, confirming the load rating of the lifter. The load rating should not be more than 80of the maximum load sustained during the test. Test loads shall not be more than 125of the rated load unless otherwise recommended by the manufacturer. Test reports should be available.American National Standard, Slings, B30.9-1971 Section 9-1.2.1 Rated capacity (working load limit) for Alloy Steel Chain Slings shall conform to the values shown in Table 1. Table 1 is only rated for Alloy Steel Chain and other grades of proof tested steel chain including Proof Coil, BBB, and Hi-Test Chain are not recommended for overhead lifting and therefore are not covered by this code. Manufacturers such as HERCALLOY stipulate "Use only alloy chain and attachments (Grade 80) for overhead lifting." CAMPBELL CHAIN, in their Industrial Chain and Accessories catalogue under System 8 (CamAlloy Chain) uses, states: "Specifically recommended for overhead lifting." All other grades uses state: "Do not use for overhead lifting." Additionally, covert Snaps are not recommended for overhead lifting by the manufacturer's such as Campbell Chain. In their publication for Covert Snaps under WARNING, states: "These products should not be used for overhead lifting or in any application where safety is a factor." Section 9-1.5.1 Hooks, rings, oblong links, pear shaped links, welded or mechanical coupling links or other attachments shall have a rated capacity at least equal to that of the alloy steel chain with which they are used.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1500.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.23 C03
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $2500.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.23 E01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $2000.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.23 E03 IV
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.23 E03 III
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.27 B01 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.27 D03
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (S)
1910.28 A01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1500.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.28 A09
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1500.00
- · Z (S) $3500.00
1910.28 A11
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.28 A13
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.94 A05 IV
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.106 E02 IVD
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.110 D10
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.147 C05 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.333 B02 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.180 B02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.180 D03 VI
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.180 G01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $2000.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.213 H01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $2000.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.213 H03
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.213 H04
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.243 C01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $3500.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.253 B03 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.253 B05 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.253 B05 IID
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.253 E01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.253 E05 III
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $2500.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.305 D
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a hazard of loads falling from overhead: a) Steel Shop - The North American Industry five (5) ton underhung crane had a homemade below the hook lifting device that was not tested to ensure compliance with American National Standards Institute B30.20a-1987, Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices. b) Steel Shop - The load to be lifted by a North American Industry five (5) ton underhung crane was attached to the sling with Covert Snaps, which are not approved to overhead lifting. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard in instance (a) is to test the below the hook lifting device, in accordance with ANSI B30.20a-1987 Section 20-1.4.1. Covert Snaps are not recommended for overhead lifting by manufacturers such as Campbell Chain, which states in its publication for Covert Snaps: "Warning -- These products should not be used for overhead lifting or in any application were safety is a factor."
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.184 E05
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.180 G01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
1910.180 D06
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 1995
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a hazard of being run over by the truck: a) Yard - Employees were transported around the yard in trucks that do not have benches or seats for them to ride on or the benches were destroyed to the point that they did not provide a safe riding seat, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to follow the direction of the safety director and install benches on all vehicles used to transport employees.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (W) $55000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to multiple injuries due to equipment failure: a) Yard - Yard Mack, Co. # 23 tractor trailer was used to haul wire around the yard and it did not have any brakes or lights, exposing employee(s) to a serious hazard. b) Yard - Mack Water Truck Co. # YTB did not have any windows, the door on the drivers side would not stay closed, the parking brake did not hold, none of the lights worked, and the drivers seat was broken. c) Yard - Ford patch crew truck did not have a operable horn, the seat was falling apart, the brake lights and turn signals did not work, and the drivers side door did not stay closed. d) Yard - GMC Yard Truck did not have any head lights, the left rear tail light, the left turn signal and, the windshield wipers did not work, and the windshield was broken. e) Yard - GMC Beam Crew Truck did not have functioning parking lights, tail lights and turn signals. f) Yard - Blue Toyota did not have functioning right front headlights, turn signals, parking brake, tail lights, and parking lights. g) Yard - GMC Steel Shop Truck did not have functioning parking and tail lights, turn signals, and parking brake, the seat was severely deteriorated, the fender was missing on the left rear, the door on the drivers side would not close, and the floor on the drivers side was completely rusted through. h) Yard - Ford Weld Truck did not have functioning parking and tail lights and turn signals. i) Yard - Dodge Van Pour Crew did not have functioning turn signals and the tail lights and the windshield was cracked. j) Yard - Green 4x4 Vault Crew Truck did not have functioning parking and tail lights, turn signals, windshield wipers and the horn did not work, and the right front head light was missing, and the windshield was broken. k) Yard - The new Trojan 1900 rubber tire front end loader, Serial Number 3137105, has a broken front window and several of the lights do not work, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. l) Yard - The rubber tire Ford front end loader, Serial Number 6332, has a broken windshield, no back up alarm or horn, numerous lights do not work, the parking brakedoes not hold, the seat is falling apart, the windshield wiper does not work, turn signals do not work and the tires are worn down to the ply, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. m) Yard - The old Trojan rubber tire front end loader, did not have any lights, the back up alarm and horn did not work, the seat had fallen apart, employee(s) were instructed to ride on the side of the machine when they were pulling wire through the form and no roll over protection was provided, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to follow recommended vehicle safety precautions and inspections.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $5000.00
- · Z (W) $55000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $25,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) with defect(s) or in any way unsafe had not been withdrawn from service until restored to safe operating condition(s): a) Yard - The Drott straddlelift/travelift crane, Serial Number 69A216237 Co. # TL2, did not have operable travel brakes, no audible alarm, no fenders or bumpers on the wheels, the horn does not work, the windows in the door and side are broken, the seat is falling apart, no signal chart is on the machine, and the company does not have an inspection program. b) Yard - The Mi-Jack travelift, Serial Number 6209589, Co. # TL4, did not have properly working travel brakes, no inspection program, stress cracks in the left rear column, no signal chart, loose bolt in the right column and the windshield was cracked. While traveling in the main building, the operators view was obstructed by the ledger beam form. The form is one hundred sixty (160) feet long and eighty six (86) inches high. A spotter was not used, the travel alarm and horn did not work and the fender and bumpers around the wheels were removed, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a crushing hazard: a) Yard - The Drott straddlelift/travelift crane, Serial Number 69A216237 Co. # TL2, did not have operable travel brakes, no audible alarm, no fenders or bumpers on the wheels, the horn does not work, the windows in the door and side are broken, the seat is falling apart, no signal chart is on the machine, and the company does not have an inspection program. b) Yard - The Mi-Jack travelift, Serial Number 6209589, Co. # TL4, did not have properly working travel brakes, no inspection program, stress cracks in the left rear column, no signal chart, loose bolt in the right column and the windshield was cracked. While traveling in the main building, the operators view was obstructed by the ledger beam form. The form is one hundred sixty (160) feet long and eighty six (86) inches high. A spotter was not used, the travel alarm and horn did not work and the fender and bumpers around the wheels were removed, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to follow the manufacture's recommendations contained in the operators manual that the Maintenance Department has.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $25000.00
- · Z (W) $55000.00
1910.180 B02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (W)
- · Z (W) $55000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to multiple injuries from cranes with defective parking brakes: a) Yard - The Galion cherry-picker, Co. Number CP1, did not have an operating parking brake, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. b) Yard - The Green Galion cherry-picker did not have an operating parking brake, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to remove the cranes from service until the brakes are repaired.
Recent events (2)
- · F (U) $1500.00
- · Z (W) $55000.00
1910.180 B02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (U)
- · Z (U)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Current $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to multiple injuries from crane(s) which had structural parts which were cracked, bent, broken or excessively corroded: a) Yard - The Galion cherry-picker, Co. Number CP1, the counterweight was bent so that it was not level with the crane body, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to remove the crane from service and to repair the crane so that counterweight was level.rweight
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Current $25,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to multiple injurers from crane(s) with defective operating brakes: a) Main Building - The green Galion cherry-picker did not have brakes that would stop the machine from motion as required in ANSI B30.5-1968, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS TO REMOVE CRANES FROM SERVICE AND REPAIR THE BRAKES.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $25000.00
- · Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to multiple injuries from crane(s) with missing windows: a) Yard and Main Building - The Galion cherry-picker, Company Number CP1, did not have any windows in the cab, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. b) Yard and Main Building - The Green Galion cherry-picker did not have any windows in the cab, exposing the employee(s) to a serious hazard. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS TO REMOVE CRANES FROM SERVICE AND REPAIR WINDOWS BEFORE OPERATING CRANES.
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (W)
1910.180 D03
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
1910.180 D03
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (W)
- · Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to multiple injuries from uninspected equipment: a) Galion cherry-picker, Company Number CP1, had not been inspected at daily to monthly intervals as evidenced by numerous deficiencies noted during the inspection, exposing the employee(s) to serious hazards. b) Green Galion cherry-picker had not been inspected at daily to monthly intervals as evidenced by numerous deficiencies noted during the inspection, including but not limited to severe oil leaks in the cab that would cause the operator's foot to slip off the brake, oil on the outside that created a slipping hazard on the steps where the operator gained access to the cab, and steering that took excessive amounts of force to make the front wheels turn, exposing the employee(s) to serious hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct these hazards is to inspect the cranes as directed by ANSI B30.15-1973 Sections 15-2.1.1 and 15-2.1.2.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W)
- · Z (W)
1910.180 D04
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
1910.180 D04
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (W)
- · Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to multiple injuries from uninspected equipment: a) Galion cherry-picker, Company Number CP1, had not been inspected at one- to twelve-month intervals as evidenced by numerous deficiencies noted during the inspection, exposing the employee(s) to serious hazards. b) Green Galion cherry-picker had not been inspected at daily to one- to twelve-month intervals as evidenced by numerous deficiencies noted during the inspection, exposing the employee(s) to serious hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct these hazards is to inspect the cranes as directed by ANSI B30.15-1973 Sections 15-2.1.1 and 15-2.1.3.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W)
- · Z (W)
1910.180 D06
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
1910.180 D06
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to multiple injuries from uninspected equipment: a) The Galion cherry-picker, Company Number CP1, had no certification records for any critical items, as evidenced by numerous deficiencies noted during the inspection, exposing the employee(s) to serious hazards. b) The green Galion cherry-picker had no certification records for any critical items, as evidenced by numerous deficiencies noted during the inspection, exposing the employee(s) to serious hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct these hazards is to make and maintain dated certification records for periodic inspections on critical items in accordance with ANSI B30.15-1973 Section 15-2.1.6.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (W)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $5000.00
- · Z (W) $55000.00
1910.180 H04 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $25,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $25000.00
- · Z (W) $55000.00
1910.244 B
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $25,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $25000.00
- · Z (W) $55000.00
1910.23 D01 III
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.24 B
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.27 B01 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.37 K02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.37 Q01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.37 Q02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.180 B02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.180 G02 III
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.184 E03 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.303 E
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.304 C04
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.305 A02 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.305 A02 IIIF
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.305 A04 III
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.334 C02
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.303 A
- Issued
- Jan 30, 1995
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 1995
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections at Eastern Prestressed Concrete Systems
View Eastern Prestressed Concrete Systems's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 123259319.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.