INWOOD, WV ·
OSHA Inspection: D & L WELD, INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of D & L WELD, INC. in SHILEY ACRES, NADENBAUSCH ROAD, INWOOD, WV 25428 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123502114.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D & L WELD, INC.
- Site address
- SHILEY ACRES, NADENBAUSCH ROAD
- City
- INWOOD
- State
- WV
- ZIP
- 25428
- Mailing
- 521 ROCK CLIFF DRIVE, MARTINSBURG, WV 25401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7353
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - P & H 75T Hydraulic Truck Crane, serial #35672, used for "bungee jumping" purposes and the crane manufacturer does not recommend such use of their equipment, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement would be to obtain written approval from the manufacturer of any equipment involved in such an application.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $3000.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $600
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - Suitable handholds and/or steps were not provided for ease in gaining access the P & H 75T Hydraulic Truck Crane cab. Operator is required to climb 32" using the outriggers, an additional 25" step to platform, and no handholds available, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement woulb be to follow guidelines in Section 15-1.8.3 ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes and OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.1051(a), General Requirements for stairways and ladders.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $600.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - On the P & H 75T Hydraulic Truck Crane, the boom angle indicator was not operational, thus the angle could not be accurately read, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement would be to repair or replace the instrument and assure it is readable from the operator's station as specified in Section 15-1.19.1.b, ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - To assist in stabilizing the personnel platform during "bungee jumping" activities the basket is attached to the jib, thus the jib is being used for purposes other than those recommended by the manufacturer, on or about May 16, 1992. One means of abatement would be to strickly adhere to manufacturer guidelines and recommendations, as specified in Section 15-1.9.1.e, ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $800
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - Inspections of the P & H 75T Hydraulic Truck Crane, serial #35672, were not conducted at intervals necessary to detect deficiencies such as, broken boom angle indicator and hydraulic line leak, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement would be to establish a program whereby frequent inspections, as defined in Section 15-2.1.1.b ANSI B30.15, are conducted, and to assure proper functions of those critical components of the crane listed in Section 15-2.1.2.a through h, ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $800.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $600
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - Documentation of required monthly inspections was not kept for the P & H 75T Hydraulic Truck Crane, serial #35672, on or about May 16, 1992. One means of abatement would be to adhere to the guidelines specified in Section 15-2.1.6 ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $600.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $600
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - Documentation of required monthly inspections was not kept for the running ropes on the P & H 75T Hydraulic Truck Crane, serial #35672, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement would be to adhere to the guidelines specified in Section15-2.4.1.a through d, ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $600.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - Those operations under the direct control of the crane operator, and in need of additional safety precautions, were not ceased and rectified to assure the safety of those involved, such as but not limited to, anti-two block device; posted load capacity of personnel platform; adequate rigging of personnel platform; side loading of boom and personnel under the load, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement would be to establish a policy whereby the crane operator has a responsibility to identify existing and predictable hazards within the scope of his/her experience knowledge, and to exercise authority to stop and refuse to handle loads until safety has been assured, as specified in Section 15-3.1.3.d ANSI B30.15 Mobil Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - Personnel platform secured to the boom/jib and the "bungee jumper" jumping and swinging subjected the boom of the P & H 75T Hydraulic Truck Crane to side loading, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement would be to discontinue the practice of attaching the man-basket to the jib and to cease side loading as specified in Section 15-3.2.3.d ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - Employee hoisted and lowered in a personnel platform connected to the hook of a P & H 75T Hydraulic Truck Crane, serial #35672, as prohibited in Section 15-3.2.3.e ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes, on or about May 16, 1992. OSHA permits the use of crane suspended personnel platforms in the construction setting if it is determined that in certain limited situations some tasks could not be accomplished in a less hazardous manner, or it was impossible to do such in any other manner. The Bungee Jumping industry does not fall within the scope of con- struction. However, similar conditions existed that are recognized hazards and warrant consideration under the OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.550(g), such as, but not limited to: - (g)(3)(ii)(a): need for a boom angle indicator; - (g)(3)(ii)(c): need for an anti-two-blocking device; - (g)(4)(i)(a) : personnel platforms not designed by a qualified engineer or a qualified person competent in structural design; - (g)(4)(i)(b) : suspension systems not designed to minimize tipping: - (g)(4)(i)(c) : platform capacity not known, thus not sure of the five times max. intended load; - (g)(4)(ii)(a): guardrail system did not meet Subpart M, and not enclosed from the toeboard to mid-rail; - (g)(4)(ii)(b): no grab rail provided; - (g)(4)(ii)(d): entrance chain not provided with restraining device to prevent accidental opening; - (g)(4)(ii)(f): no head protection worn; - (g)(4)(ii)(i): personnel platform had no plate or marking indicating the weight of the platform and rated load capacity; - (g)(4)(iv)(a): rigging bridle not connected to a master link or shackle; - (g)(4)(iv)(b): hook not of the type to be closed and locked; - (g)(4)(iv)(d): eyes in wire rope slings not fabricated with thimbles; - (g)(5)(vi) : proof testing to 125of capacity not done, no one knew the capacity of the platform; - (g)(6)(i) : body parts not kept inside the platform; - (g)(6)(iv) : crane opertor left controls and platform was suspended and occupied; One feasible means of abatement would be to cease operations where employees are required to be on the load or hook while hoisting, lowering, swinging, or travelling.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $800
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - The operator of the P & H Truck Crane left his position, and the personnel platform and "Jump Master" remained suspended, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement would be to establish safe work practices whereby crane operator(s) never leave the controls with the load suspended, as specified in Section 15-3.2.4.a ANSI B30.15 Mobile Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $800.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards: a. Shirley Acres - The employee(s) were allowed to stand or pass under the personnel platform while it was suspended, on or about May 16, 1992. One feasible means of abatement would be to establish safe procedures and areas whereby garound crew employees are not in any danger zone nor permitted to stand or pass under the load or hook, as specified in Section 15-3.2.4.b, ANSI B30.15 bile Hydraulic Cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · D (S)
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1903.2 A01
- Issued
- Jun 19, 1992
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 1992
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections at D & L Weld, INC.
View D & L Weld, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in WV
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 123502114.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.