NACOGDOCHES, TX —
OSHA Inspection: GREEN ACRES FOODS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GREEN ACRES FOODS, INC. in 928 BUTT STREET, NACOGDOCHES, TX 75961 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123555179.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GREEN ACRES FOODS, INC.
- Site address
- 928 BUTT STREET
- City
- NACOGDOCHES
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75961
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 631620, NACOGDOCHES, TX 75961
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2015
- Employees
- 650
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- May 29, 1994
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Operations in the Further Processing 1 and 2 departments where employee(s) performed job tasks such as wing scoring, tender pulling, breast removal (from the wing) and debone inspecting and other processes producing biomechanical stress to the hands, wrists, arms and shoulders. This biomechanical stress resulted in musculosketal disorders which included, but not limited to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), tendinitis and muscular sprains: The employer is not limited to abatement methods suggested by OSHA, i.e., methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. Other methods of abatement may be equally or more appropriate. Ultimate responsibility for determining the most appropriate abatement method rests with the employer, given its superior knowledge of the specific conditions on its worksite. Among others, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct the hazard is the development and implementation of an ergonomic management program consisting of the following elements: (a) Implementation of a comprehensive ergonomics program including the formation of an ergonomic committee. The committee should include production employees serving on a regular or rotational basis as committee members. The committee could devise a comprehensive strategy to address the ergonomic problems, institute changes, and track those changes to verify success. The committee should meet on a regular (such as monthly) basis, to develop ideas and strategies addressing ergonomic issues. Select members of the committee should conduct regular walk-around inspections focusing on work place design, work practices, etc. The ergonomic program should be written and should state specific goals as developed by the committee. Employees should be provided an easy way of providing input into ergonomic issues, and should be encouraged to provide ideas on hazard abatement, work station design, etc. (b) Do additional job and stress factor analysis to isolate and quantify the types and numbers of repetitive trauma disorders, and the root causes of these disorders. Periodic video taping of jobs may be useful. Develop standardized forms for evaluation of the job task, work station design, and work practices. Surveys completed by the employees would provide useful information. (c) Provide continuing education for all affected employees in regard to cumulative stress disorders, and ensure employees are following work practice guidelines. Training should include signs and symptoms of repetitive trauma disorders, and should include a basic discussion of anatomy, causation, and prevention. Topics such as correct hand/wrist position should be discussed. Basic definitions of carpal tunnel syndrome, tendinitis, and other common CTD's should be provided. Anatomical models of the wrist may be useful in describing the above items. Prevention, diagnosis, and the full range of available medical treatments should be discussed. Monitoring of the employees should be done to assure that appropriate work practices are being utilized. Comprehensive ergonomic training should also be provided for first line supervisors and the on-site medical staff. (d) Test the use of ergonomically designed scissors or knives in evisceration, the cone line, and portion control. (e) Provide a program of continued on the job exercises at several times throughout the workshift. Instruct employees on appropriate exercises, and encourage employees to perform these exercises at home. (f) Provide stools or rest for employees who stand throughout their shift, such as portion control and some cone debone operations. (g) Develop a training line for new employees. Consider the use of an employer/employee pairs who are specifically trained to recognize ergonomic stress factors. These pairs could routinely walk the production lines and identify employees using poor work techniques, improperly designed work stations, and other stressors. (h) Provide retractable tool supports for pneumatic scissors, (used in the manual process/salvage area). Consider expanded use of pneumatic scissors along the evisceration line. (i) Provide a logical and systematic system for job rotation, (for job operations where rotation would reduce exposure). Supervisors should not have discretion over rotational schemes unless a systematic and proven rotational plan has been tried and proven effective. (j) Develop a more comprehensive data base for tracking ergonomic disorders. The data base should be sufficient to track the number, type, and statistical distribution of repetitive trauma disorders. Reports could be generated on a regular, (e.g. monthly basis), and could be reviewed by the ergonomic committee. Problem areas could be re-evaluated, causative factors isolated, and changes implemented and tracked. (k) Hire a full time ergonomic trainer with experience in the field of ergonomics, or provide extensive training to current staff members, and supervisors. The person currently in charge of training may not be sufficiently knowledgeable in ergonomics as a discipline. (l) Reevaluate the wing scoring, tender pulling, breast removing, and debone inspecting operations with emphasis in the cutting, pulling, and sorting processes. Repetitive handling of tools and the product is causing injuries. Consider the use of a shaker table or grooved conveyor apparatus in the place of the current conveyors. (m) Slowing the speed and frequency of poultry product per unit time processed by employees. (n) Institute a fitness/wellness program (including proper weight, diet and nutrition, reduction or elimination of smoking, prevention and rehabilitation of alcoholism, stress management, and properly implemented and supervised exercise programs). ABATEMENT STEPS Step 1: Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to minimize and/or eliminate the potential for musculoskeletal trauma disorders which can and may result in cumulative trauma disorders. This plan shall include, at minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: (1) Evaluation of engineering/administrative controls of options; (2) Selection of control methods and completion of design; (3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; and (4) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. Step 2: Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $2700.00
- — I (S) $2700.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $2,625 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2625.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.20 G01 I
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $750
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O) $750.00
1910.20 G01 II
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.20 G01 III
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.20 G02
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 B03
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Nov 24, 1993
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Green Acres Foods, INC.
View Green Acres Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 123555179.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.