Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TEXAS DRY DOCK

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of TEXAS DRY DOCK in 2500 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD., PORT ARTHUR, TX 77642 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123627507.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Texas DRY Dock for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Texas DRY Dock is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TEXAS DRY DOCK
Site address
2500 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD.
City
PORT ARTHUR
State
TX
ZIP
77642
Mailing
P O BOX 2367, PORT ARTHUR, TX 77643
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3731
Employees
500
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Maritime safety.

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Sep 1, 1999
Abate by
Sep 7, 1999
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to:
a) the hazard of falling from elevation due to vertical gate electrical
interlocking devices failed
to function on a Alimak rack and pinion elevator, model no. 18/30, #3122,
1981.  Elevator had
not received a daily safety check, such as, but not limited to 1) check
gates, rollers and gate
cable, 2) apply power, check push buttons for control, check emergency
stop, and check
mechanical and electrical interlocks, 3) monitor automatic stopping
position of unit at both
bottom and top landing to insure proper functioning of upper and lower
limits.
Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct
this hazard is to
maintain written, dated and signed inspection reports and records of daily
examination of
elevators in accordance with ANSI A 17.2, 1973, Part I Routine Inspection
and/or comply with
manufacturing recommendation.
Disclaimers:
1.  You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above.
2.  The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all
cases.
3.  The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an
appropriate method.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.303 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Sep 1, 1999
Abate by
Sep 7, 1999
Penalty
Initial $5,000
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 123627507.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.