PORT ARTHUR, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: TEXAS DRY DOCK
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of TEXAS DRY DOCK in 2500 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD., PORT ARTHUR, TX 77642 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123627507.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEXAS DRY DOCK
- Site address
- 2500 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD.
- City
- PORT ARTHUR
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77642
- Mailing
- P O BOX 2367, PORT ARTHUR, TX 77643
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3731
- Employees
- 500
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Maritime safety.
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 1, 1999
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a) the hazard of falling from elevation due to vertical gate electrical interlocking devices failed to function on a Alimak rack and pinion elevator, model no. 18/30, #3122, 1981. Elevator had not received a daily safety check, such as, but not limited to 1) check gates, rollers and gate cable, 2) apply power, check push buttons for control, check emergency stop, and check mechanical and electrical interlocks, 3) monitor automatic stopping position of unit at both bottom and top landing to insure proper functioning of upper and lower limits. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard is to maintain written, dated and signed inspection reports and records of daily examination of elevators in accordance with ANSI A 17.2, 1973, Part I Routine Inspection and/or comply with manufacturing recommendation. Disclaimers: 1. You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2. The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
1910.303 C
- Issued
- Sep 1, 1999
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $5000.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 123627507.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.