FREEPORT, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: BENCH COMPANY, INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of BENCH COMPANY, INC. in 702 FM 523, FREEPORT, TX 77541 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 123649949.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BENCH COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 702 FM 523
- City
- FREEPORT
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77541
- Mailing
- 2523 MCKEEVER, ROSHARON, TX 77583
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1629
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 9, 1997
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck by an overturning truck crane and its load. At the jobsite at Schenectady International, an employee was struck by an overturning hydraulic truck crane (Gallion, Model 150EA, Serial # 10472) while walking or working near the crane. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to designate a person that will be responsible for determining and controlling safety as specified by paragraph 15-3.2.3-m of American National Standard, ANSI B30.15. His determinations shall be in accord with decisions such as position of load, boom location, ground support, travel route, and speed of movement. In addition, specified tire pressures shall be maintained. The boom shall be carried in line with the direction of motion. Sudden starts and stops must be avoided. Tag or restraint should be used to snub swinging of the load.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 9, 1997
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1997
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck by an overturning truck crane and its load. At the jobsite at Schenectady International, an employee was struck by an overturning hydraulic truck crane (Gallion, Model 150EA, Serial #10472). Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to avoid sudden starts and stops when rotating the crane. The rotational speed shall be such that the load will not swing out beyond the radii at which it can be used when rotation of the load is hazardous as specified by paragraph 15-3.2.3-o of American National Standard, ANSI B30.15.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 9, 1997
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being struck by an overturning truck crane and its load due to the lack of proper examination of the crane operator. At the jobsite at Schenectady International, an employee was struck by an overturning truck crane. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to require crane operators to pass a practical examination and the examination shall be limited to the specific type of equipment which he will operate as specified by paragraph 15-3.2.3-o of American National Standard, ANSI B30.5.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Oct 9, 1997
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1997
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 9, 1997
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being crushed inside the cab of the crane because crane operator was not using seat belt when operating the hydraulic truck crane (Gallion, Model 150 EA, serial # 10472). Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to require, enforce, and monitor the use of safety seat belt by the crane operator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $1500.00
1926.59 E01
- Issued
- Oct 9, 1997
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 1997
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 123649949.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.