HARRISONBURG, VA —
OSHA Inspection: STOREMEN SPECIALTY INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STOREMEN SPECIALTY INC. in 4444 RAWLEY PIKE, HARRISONBURG, VA 22801 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 126614668.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STOREMEN SPECIALTY INC.
- Site address
- 4444 RAWLEY PIKE
- City
- HARRISONBURG
- State
- VA
- ZIP
- 22801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3585
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
16 citations on file for this inspection.
510001 A
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- May 15, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
40.1-51.1(a) of the Code of Virginia: Storeman Specialty, Inc. did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were operating a Chicago Hydraulic Press Brake, Model #1012-L; Serial #L-17961; 60-90 Tons, and a Niagara Shear, which are located in the metal shop, which exposed them to: (a) Amputations by not having a disconnect switch capable of isolating the press brake and control system from the main power supply. The press brake has an on and off switch but it is not capable of being physically locked out. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install a disconnect switch to the press brake such as that called for by ANSI B11.3-1982, American National Standard Safety Code for Power Press Brakes. (b) Amputations by not having a magnetic starter to prevent the press brake from automatically restarting upon restoration of power. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to install a drive motor so that the operator would have to restart the press brake upon restoration of power such as that called for by ANSI B11.3-1982, American National Standard Safety Code for Power Press Brakes. (c) Amputations by not performing daily, weekly, monthly and annual inspections and maintaining inspection records to ensure that all of their parts, auxiliary equipment, and safeguards are in safe operating condition on the press brake. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement a daily, weekly, monthly, and annual inspection list for what should be inspected for the above described time frames and, to maintain these inspection records such as that called for by ANSI B11.3-1982, American National Standard Safety Code for Power Press Brakes. (d) Amputations by not providing the operator training on the press brake to provide knowledge of the function and purpose of safeguarding and the dangers of unsafe work practices, inattention, horseplay, and misuse of equipment. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to implement operator training on the power press brake such as that called for by ANSI B11.3-1982, American National Standard Safety Code for Power Press Brakes. (e) Amputation by not providing a cover for the foot treadle on the press brake and the shear to prevent accidental actuation by falling or moving objects, or by someone stepping on it. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to provide a cover over the foot treadles for the press brake and the shear such as that called for by ANSI B11.3-1982, American National Standard Safety Code for Power Press Brakes and ANSI B11.4-1983, American National StandardSafety Code for Shears. (f) Contusions and abrasions by not providing adequate safeguarding to the back of the shear to prevent the operator and other employees from injury by being too close to the stock as it completes its cycle. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be to provide an awareness barrier on the back of the shear to prevent employees from coming too close to the machine such as that called for by ANSI B11.4-1983, American National Standard Safety Code for Shears.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $150.00
- — I (S) $150.00
- — Z (S) $300.00
1910.107 B10
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $150 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $150.00
- — Z (S) $300.00
1910.107 I06
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $188 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $187.50
- — Z (S) $375.00
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $113 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $112.50
- — Z (S) $225.00
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 30, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $150 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $150.00
- — Z (S) $300.00
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $113 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $112.50
- — Z (S) $225.00
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $113 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $112.50
- — Z (S) $225.00
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $113 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $112.50
- — Z (S) $225.00
1910.303 G02 II
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $113 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $112.50
- — Z (S) $225.00
1910.94 C07 IIIB
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.178 L
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.304 F05 VC1
- Issued
- Feb 26, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 1999
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Storemen Specialty INC.
View Storemen Specialty INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in VA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 126614668.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.