HACKENSACK, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: HALOCARBON PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HALOCARBON PRODUCTS CORPORATION in 82 BURLEWS COURT, HACKENSACK, NJ 07601 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 17635889.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HALOCARBON PRODUCTS CORPORATION
- Site address
- 82 BURLEWS COURT
- City
- HACKENSACK
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07601
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2869
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of inhalation of chloro-cracker trap material: a) Employees in the Oils Section were exposed and potentially exposed to hazardous concentrations of 1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoro, 3-chloro-1-propene (PFCP) during the processing of chloropolymer cracker trap material. Exposure to PFCP has been shown to cause pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary edema hemorrahaging, and/or death. On or about 2/1/89. One feasible means of abatement among others would be to: 1) Provide a ventilated secondary enclosure of all pipes, lines, valves, and vessels used to contain or process material containing PFCP. 2) Ensure that all piping and lines including reactor sampling lines, and feed lines, etc. are suitable for permanent type use and contain no temporary attachments. 3) Remove all obsolete or non-functional valves and piping. 4) Ensure that all valves, etc., are clearly labeled as to their function. 5) Ventilate these secondary enclosures to a remote and safe location perferably through a scrubber suitable for the use. 6) Monitor the airspace of these secondary enclosures to specifically detect leaks of the PFCP at the lowest feasible level. 7) Provide for emergency procedures for shutdown in the event of leak detection including the installation of remotely actuated devices. 8) Conduct preventive maintenance on a regular basis on entire system. 9) Install knock-out pots for pressure vessels G-551 and G-552 to containing any accidental release.
Recent events (2)
- · F (O) $750.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of overpressure and failure of pressure vessels: a) The Oils Section: Pressure vessels were not protected with appropriate overpressure devices. Rupture disks present on the vessels were not free from backpressure. One feasible means of abatement, among others, would be to establish a preventive maintenance program for all pressure vessels which includes: 1) Frequent checks and bleed-off of backpressure between rupture disk and pressure relief valves. 2) Assurance that all rupture disks meet ASME UG-127 requirements including being tagged with a stamped bursting pressure at a specified disk temperature. 3) Assurance thatall pressure vessels have been marked within conformance with ASME requirements as to pressure and temperature limits. Observed on or about 3/22/89
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of inhalation of D.F.O. materials: a) Employees in the Oils Section were exposed and potentially exposed to hazardous concentrations of low molecular weight brominated fluorocarbons, bromine, and by-products during the processing of brominated fluorocarbons. Componenets of this complex mixture have have been shown to cause damage to internal organs and death in animal studies. Observed on or about 5/11/89. One feasible means of abatement, among others, would be to: 1) Provide a closed system of all pipes, lines, valves and vessels used to contain or process material containing brominated fluorocarbons and by-products including cracker trap material. 2) Ensure that all piping and lines are suitable for permanent type use and contain no temporary attachments. 3) Ensure that all valves, lines, etc. are clearly labeled as to their function. 4) Ensure that all transfer operations are conducted in an enclosed system. 5) Monitor the airspace around these enclosures to specifically detect leaks of brominated fluorocarbons at the lowest feasible level. 6) Provide for emergency procedures for shutdown in the event of leak detection including the installation of remotely actuated devices. 7) Conduct preventive maintenance on a regular basis on entire systems. 8) Based upon a complete hazard determination, secondary enclosures may be required.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1910.134 B08
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1910.134 F02 II
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1910.1200 D01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 1989
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1910.1200 G02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1910.1200 H02 I
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1910.1200 H02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $1000.00
1910.134 E03
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $1000.00
- · Z (W) $1000.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $10,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $10000.00
- · Z (W) $10000.00
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $1000.00
- · Z (W) $1000.00
1910.1200 H02 II
- Issued
- Jul 25, 1989
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $1000.00
- · Z (W) $1000.00
More inspections at Halocarbon Products Corporation
View Halocarbon Products Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 17635889.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.