BUHL, ID —
OSHA Inspection: CLEAR SPRINGS FOODS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CLEAR SPRINGS FOODS, INC. in CLEARLAKES ROAD, BUHL, ID 83316 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 17730862.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLEAR SPRINGS FOODS, INC.
- Site address
- CLEARLAKES ROAD
- City
- BUHL
- State
- ID
- ZIP
- 83316
- Mailing
- POST OFFICE BOX 712, BUHL, ID 83316
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2092
- Employees
- 200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform repetitive motions in postures resulting in stressors, such as ulnar deviation with extension and supination, pinch grip and extension with supination of the left hand and ulnar deviation of the right wrist (for the inspectors) and shoulder flexion and back flexion (for the feeders), which were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: a) Evisceration Department - Employees feeding the evisceration machines employees inspecting the eviscerated trout and employees manually gutting the specialty trout. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include, but are not limited to, the following: Abatement Recommendations: 1) Modifications of the evisceration machine feed troughs, such as raising the trough heights and slopes, to eliminate or reduce the flexing of the back and shoulders of the feeders. 2) Installation of evisceration machines for the trout which are presently eviscerated manually to reduce or eliminate the stress on the manual gutting operation. 3) Modification of the eviscerated trout trough level, so that inspectors and manual gutters do not reach down, bend down, etc., 4) Modification of the inspectors stools, to allow for individual adjustments in height and for more comfortable contoured seating. 5) Provide a worker manipulated suction device to remove the remaining contents of the eviscerated trout cavity, and reduce manual exertion by the inspectors. 6) Implementation of training, information and medical programs which would include: a) Employee training in the recognition of early symptoms and prevention of cumulative trauma disorders; b) New employee informational programs on the subject discusses above; and, c) Medical programs to diagnose early symptoms of cumulative trauma disorders and reduce the incidence rates.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform repetitive motions in postures resulting in stressors, such as ulnar deviation of the hands, wrist flexion and neck flexion, and shoulder flexion, which were likely, to cause cumulative trauma disorders: a) Boning Department - The "boners", manually removing rib cages (and occasionally fins). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include, but are not limited to, the following: Abatement Recommendations: 1) Modification of the "boners" chairs so that they lock onto position at the table, and reduce stress on the boner's legs and back. 2) Modification of the conveyors, such as reducing their height, to reduce the shoulder flexion involved in tossing the "boned" trout into the bins. 3) Evaluate the use of double edged knives and the removal of the scouring on knife blades, to reduce wrist exertion and (hand) ulnar deviation in the rib cage removal operation. 4) Encourage the use of a single glove (per hand) to reduce the force needed to grip knives, and trout. 5) Evaluate the feasibility of a rotating table surface that will allow for reduced upper extremity motion by the boner during a cut, and during the repositioning of a trout for a "second side" cut. 6) Train the boner's to make the cuts with minimal wrist flexion and ulnar deviation of the hands. Note: A good example of acceptable cutting methods was demonstrated by a left handed worker who was found to use minimal wrist flexion and hand deviation in her cuts. 7) Implementation of training, medical and informational programs as described in Citation 1, Item 1.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $500.00
- — F (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were re- quired to perform repetitive motions in postures resulting in stressors, such as high grip force (pinch grip) and ulnar deviation of the left hand, high grip force and compression on the palm (or palm side of thumbs) due to the hilt guard of the knife, and ulnar deviation of the right hand; and shoulder flexion which were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: (a) Fillet Department - the employees removing fins from trout. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include, but are not limited to, the following: Abatement Recommendations: 1. Implement the use of mechanical knives, such as the "whizard" type, to reduce wrist and hand exertion in cutting fins. 2. Use of short blade knives to achieve goals similar to #1. 3. Reduction of the (de-finned trout) conveyor height, to reduce shoulder flexion in the tossing of trout onto the conveyor. 4. Modification of the workstation so that the trout are fed onto the fillet department employee's work table, and reduces the employee's need to bend over, and across the body, to reach the trout. 5. Evaluation of mechanical clamps to be used on the trout tails while fin removal takes place, to reduce pinch grip force. 6. Implementation of medical training and informational programs described earlier.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500.00
- — P (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform repetitive motions in postures resulting in stressors,such as left arm static exertion, compression of the left palm each time the activation lever is hit and pinch grip with the right hand (for the bagger operator), shoulder flexions (for the fish scale operators), which were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: a) Packaging Department - The Remco Bagger operator, and scale operators. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operations, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Use of a light beam actuated control or other automatic cycling of the bagger operation. 2) Redesign of the workstation so the operator faces the bagger and the fish and control lever are within easy reach to relive the current extension of the arms and body. 3) Allow for seated work to relieve back stress. 4) Redesign the feed bucket so that fish slide down a chute for easy feed in the bagger, to relieve back and shoulder stress. 5) The lowering of the fish scale height to table level to relieve the shoulder flexion of the weighers. 6) Implementation fo the training, medical and informational programs described earlier.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $500.00
- — P (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $100
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O) $100.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $100 · Current $100
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $100.00
- — Z (O) $100.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 1989
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 1989
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 1989
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 1989
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 1989
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Clear Springs Foods, INC.
View Clear Springs Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in ID
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 17730862.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.