Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TESTA TREE SERVICE

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of TESTA TREE SERVICE in CORNER OF MELLEN ST. & PLAIN ST., HOPEDALE, MA 01632 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 17828716.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Testa Tree Service for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Testa Tree Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TESTA TREE SERVICE
Site address
CORNER OF MELLEN ST. & PLAIN ST.
City
HOPEDALE
State
MA
ZIP
01632
Mailing
18 HUNTINGTON STREET, NATICK, MA 01760
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
0721
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 1993
Abate by
Nov 16, 1993
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the hazard of falling from a tree when not protected by
fall protection at all
times.
A worker involved in the removal of a tree, fell an estimated 60 ft. when
the safety belt he was
wearing was not secured to anything.  Among other methods, one feasible
and acceptable
method to correct this hazard is to insure that when workers are working
in trees, they are tied
off at all times.  One method to insure this is accomplished is through
the use of a double
lanyard system which protects workers during the tying and untying
periods.
A) CORNER OF MELLEN AND PLAIN ST.:  A WORKER INVOLVED IN THE
REMOVAL OF A TREE WAS NOT PROTECTED FROM A FALL AT ALL TIMES WHILE
IN THE TREE THROUGH THE USE OF A SAFETY BELT AND LINE. THE WORKER
HAD A SAFETY BELT ON BUT IT WAS NOT CONNECTED TO ANYTHING. ONE
METHOD TO INSURE THAT THERE IS NO EXPOSURE TO A FALL IS TO UTILIZE A
DOUBLE LANYARD SYSTEM WHEN MOVING FROM ONE AREA TO ANOTHER. THIS
SYSTEM  ALLOWS THE WORKER TO BE TIED OFF AT ALL TIMES.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S) $1500.00

1910.132 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 1993
Abate by
Nov 16, 1993
Penalty
Initial $300
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S) $300.00

1910.133 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 1993
Abate by
Nov 16, 1993
Penalty
Initial $300
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S) $300.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 17828716.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.