PROVIDENCE, RI ·
OSHA Inspection: CLEAN HARBORS OF KINGSTON INC
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of CLEAN HARBORS OF KINGSTON INC in 99 WEST RIVER STREET, PROVIDENCE, RI 02904 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 17945213.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLEAN HARBORS OF KINGSTON INC
- Site address
- 99 WEST RIVER STREET
- City
- PROVIDENCE
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02904
- Mailing
- 85 ALDRICH STREET, PROVIDENCE, RI 02905
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4953
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 B05
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $5000.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.134 B06
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $5000.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.134 F05 I
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 1993
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $25,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of oxygen dificiency and/or dangerous accumulations of toxic vapors (such as toluene), while entering an ink tank on or about October 22-23, 1992, to remove solvent-containing ink sludge. These exposures could result in asphyxiation, chemical poisoning and/or death. The hazards resulted from deficiencies in the company's confined space entry program, to wit: (a) Ineffective retrieval system to remove disabled or unconscious worker from the confined space. (b) Failure to provide rescue capability for individuals in a confined space should an emergency arise. (c) Lack of supervisory controls over the work being performed in the tank. (d) Ineffective ventilation of the confined space prior to and during entry. (e) Ineffective sampling of the confined space for the presence of sufficient oxygen, and the absence of hazardous levels of flammable vapors and toxics prior to and during entry. (f) Failure to perform continuous testing of the atmosphere within the tank for levels of toxic air contaminants during mucking operations. Among other methods, feasible ways to correct these hazards are: (a) Provide mechanical retrieval equipment. (b) Make arrangements with offsite emergency response personnel who are capable of performing a rescue, and who are familiar with the premises and can respond in a timely manner. (c) Ensure that the individual in charge of the entry does not perform other tasks which may interfere with the performance of duties necessary for a safe entry. (d) Ensure that ventilation is designed and arranged so that all areas of the confined space are effectively ventilated. It is particularly important to consider the source and path of make-up air. (e) Ensure that sampling methodology takes into consideration the shape and remoteness of areas within the confined space. Confined spaces which are deep may require that a probe or extension be added to the sampling equipment to ensure that, within all areas in the confined space, levels of oxygen are sufficient and concentrations of flammable gases and toxics are within acceptable ranges. (f) Continuous monitoring should be performed where operations within the confined space may cause levels of airborne toxic contaminants to change.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $25000.00
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $25,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $25000.00
- · Z (W) $70000.00
1910.134 B07
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 1993
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (W)
1910.134 B11
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 1993
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (W)
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (O) $1000.00
- · Z (O) $1000.00
1904.4
- Issued
- Mar 23, 1993
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- · F (O) $1000.00
- · Z (O) $1000.00
More inspections at Clean Harbors of Kingston INC
View Clean Harbors of Kingston INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 17945213.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.