NEWPORT NEWS, VA ·
OSHA Inspection: COMMERICAL TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of COMMERICAL TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO. in HARBOR ROAD PIER II, NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23607 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 17969411.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COMMERICAL TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.
- Site address
- HARBOR ROAD PIER II
- City
- NEWPORT NEWS
- State
- VA
- ZIP
- 23607
- Mailing
- 1029 WEST 45TH STREET, NORFOLK, VA 23508
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4491
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,875 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a). Ingoing nip points and moving parts on the sampler conveyor sustem at Pier II of Newport News Marine Terminals during maintenance and inspection operations due to the fact that an adequate and complete Lockout/Tagout procedure was not developed and implemented. The lockout program being used did not have: 1. A written procedure outlining the purpose, responsibility, scope, authorization, rules, definitions and measures to enforce compliance, 2. Periodic inspections of the procedures, 3. Locks that were singularly identified and specifically approved for lockout purposes and 4. Employee training on the policy and procedures of the lockout program. Amoung other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to develope a written lockout procedure outlining each step employees must follow, train employees in the complete lockout procedure and implement annual inspections of the lockout program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200.00
- · Z (S) $1875.00
1917.28 E01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 1991
1917.28 H
- Issued
- Aug 22, 1991
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 1991
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in VA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 17969411.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.