Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: COMMERICAL TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of COMMERICAL TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO. in HARBOR ROAD PIER II, NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23607 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 17969411.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Commerical Testing and Engineering CO. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Commerical Testing and Engineering CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HARBOR ROAD PIER II
City
NEWPORT NEWS
State
VA
ZIP
23607
Mailing
1029 WEST 45TH STREET, NORFOLK, VA 23508
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
4491
Employees
9
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 1991
Abate by
Oct 8, 1991
Penalty
Initial $1,875 · Current $1,200 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:       The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment
which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely
to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees
were exposed to:
a).  Ingoing nip points and moving parts on the sampler conveyor
sustem at Pier II of Newport News Marine Terminals during
maintenance and inspection operations due to the fact that an
adequate and complete Lockout/Tagout procedure was not developed
and implemented.  The lockout program being used did not have:
1.  A written procedure outlining the purpose, responsibility,
scope, authorization, rules, definitions and measures to enforce
compliance,
2.  Periodic inspections of the procedures,
3. Locks that were singularly identified and specifically
approved for lockout purposes and
4.  Employee training on the policy and procedures of the lockout
program.
Amoung other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement
method to correct this hazard is to develope a written lockout
procedure outlining each step employees must follow, train
employees in the complete lockout procedure and implement annual
inspections of the lockout program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200.00
  • · Z (S) $1875.00

1917.28 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 1991
Abate by
Oct 8, 1991

1917.28 H

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 1991
Abate by
Oct 8, 1991

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 17969411.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.