ALACHUA, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: J.F. COPELAND FARM
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of J.F. COPELAND FARM in 19201 NW CR 235-A, ALACHUA, FL 32615 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 18007484.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J.F. COPELAND FARM
- Site address
- 19201 NW CR 235-A
- City
- ALACHUA
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32615
- Mailing
- 17978 NW 190TH AVE., HIGH SPRINGS, FL 32643
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 0711
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $218 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an anhydrous ammonia hazard: a.On or about April 21, 2000, anhydrous ammonia transfer area, the liquid filling connection at the globe valve did not have an internal back-pressure check valve or an internal excess flow valve, as required by American National Standards Institute (ANSI) K61.1-1989 section 5.5.11. b.On or about April 21, 2000, anhydrous ammonia transfer area, the vapor connection at the globe valve did not have an internal excess flow valve as, required by American National Standards Institute (ANSI) K61.1-1989 section 5.5.11. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to install an excessive flow valve for both the liquid and vapor connections at the respective globe valves. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $218.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $218 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an anhydrous ammonia hazard: a.On or about April 21, 2000, anhydrous ammonia transfer area, the employer did not ensure that an employee wore protective gloves and chemical splash goggles before transferring ammonia, as required by American National Standards Institute (ANSI) K61.1-1989 section 3.2.1. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to ensure that all employees exposed to anyhdrous ammonia under normal conditions wear protective gloves and chemical splash goggles. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $218.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $218 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to an anhydrous ammonia hazard: a.On or about April 21, 2000, anhydrous ammonia storage/transfer area, the employer did not provide emergency and rescue equipment such as, but not limited to protective boots and protective pants, as required by American National Standards Institute (ANSI) K61.1-1989 sections 3.4.1.3 and 3.4.1.4. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide and maintain one pair of protective boots and pants. This personal protective equipment (PPE) must be on hand at the permanent storage installation. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $218.00
- · Z (S) $375.00
1910.111 B10 II
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2000
1910.111 B09 IX
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $173 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $173.00
- · Z (S) $300.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $173 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $173.00
- · Z (S) $300.00
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2000
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2000
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2000
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2000
1910.111 B05 V
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2000
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 18007484.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.