Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNISTREAM PLASTICS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UNISTREAM PLASTICS in 9292 WATSON INDUSTRIAL PARK, CRESTWOOD, MO 63126 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 18200394.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Unistream Plastics — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Unistream Plastics is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
UNISTREAM PLASTICS
Site address
9292 WATSON INDUSTRIAL PARK
City
CRESTWOOD
State
MO
ZIP
63126
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3089
Employees
20
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

13 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 07 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Jan 4, 1990
Penalty
Initial $350 · Current $350
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
crushing hazards due to inadvertent or intentional start up of machinery
while performing maintenance or cleaning operations on plant equipment
such as, but not limited to, the large plastic recycle grinder.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to establish and enforce an adequate plant
lockout/tagout procedure conisting of, but not limited to, the
following:
1) The development of an energy control program, using locks when
equipment can be locked out.
2) Employment of additional means to ensure safety when tags rather than
locks are used to control energy sources by implementing and
enforcing an effective tagout program.
3) Ensure that new equipment or overhauled equipment can accomodate
locks.
4) Identification and implementation of specific procedures (preferably
in writing) for the control of hazardous energy including preparation
for shutdown, actual shutdown of equipment, isolation of equipment,
lockout/tagout application, release of stored energy, and
verification of isolation.
5) Institution of procedures for release of lockout/tagout including
machine inspection, notification and safe positioning of employees
and removal of the lockout/tagout device.
6) Obtaining standardized locks and tags which indicate the identity of
the employees using them and which are of sufficient quality and
durability to ensure their effectiveness.
7) Conducting inspections of energy control procedures on a frequent
basis.
8) Training of employees in the specific energy procedures with training
reminders as part of the periodic inspections of the control
procedures.
9) Adoption of procedures to ensure safety when equipment must be tested
during servicing: when outside contractors are working at the site;
when a multiple lockout is needed for a crew servicing equipment and
when shifts or personnel change.
The abatement method outlined above is general and the employer, based
on his superior knowledge or working conditions, is responsible for
developing and implementing an abatement method which will be suitably
protective of employee's safety and health.
NOTE: The new OSHA Lockout/Tagout standard went into effect October
31, 1989 and should be followed when developing an abatement program.
However there has been an administrative stay on enforcement until
January 2, 1990.

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 06 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Nov 22, 1989
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300

1910.304 A02

Serious Gravity 04 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Nov 30, 1989
Penalty
Initial $200 · Current $200

1910.305 B01

Serious Gravity 04 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Nov 22, 1989
Penalty
Initial $200 · Current $200

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 06 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Jan 4, 1990
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300

1910.1200 G01

Serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Nov 21, 1989

1910.1200 H

Serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Jan 4, 1990

1910.22 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Jan 4, 1990

1910.24 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Nov 22, 1989

1910.38 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Jan 4, 1990

1910.219 E03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Nov 22, 1989

1910.305 G01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Nov 22, 1989

1910.305 J04 IIE

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 1989
Abate by
Nov 22, 1989

View Unistream Plastics's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 18200394.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.