CRESTWOOD, MO —
OSHA Inspection: UNISTREAM PLASTICS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UNISTREAM PLASTICS in 9292 WATSON INDUSTRIAL PARK, CRESTWOOD, MO 63126 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 18200394.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UNISTREAM PLASTICS
- Site address
- 9292 WATSON INDUSTRIAL PARK
- City
- CRESTWOOD
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63126
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3089
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $350
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards due to inadvertent or intentional start up of machinery while performing maintenance or cleaning operations on plant equipment such as, but not limited to, the large plastic recycle grinder. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to establish and enforce an adequate plant lockout/tagout procedure conisting of, but not limited to, the following: 1) The development of an energy control program, using locks when equipment can be locked out. 2) Employment of additional means to ensure safety when tags rather than locks are used to control energy sources by implementing and enforcing an effective tagout program. 3) Ensure that new equipment or overhauled equipment can accomodate locks. 4) Identification and implementation of specific procedures (preferably in writing) for the control of hazardous energy including preparation for shutdown, actual shutdown of equipment, isolation of equipment, lockout/tagout application, release of stored energy, and verification of isolation. 5) Institution of procedures for release of lockout/tagout including machine inspection, notification and safe positioning of employees and removal of the lockout/tagout device. 6) Obtaining standardized locks and tags which indicate the identity of the employees using them and which are of sufficient quality and durability to ensure their effectiveness. 7) Conducting inspections of energy control procedures on a frequent basis. 8) Training of employees in the specific energy procedures with training reminders as part of the periodic inspections of the control procedures. 9) Adoption of procedures to ensure safety when equipment must be tested during servicing: when outside contractors are working at the site; when a multiple lockout is needed for a crew servicing equipment and when shifts or personnel change. The abatement method outlined above is general and the employer, based on his superior knowledge or working conditions, is responsible for developing and implementing an abatement method which will be suitably protective of employee's safety and health. NOTE: The new OSHA Lockout/Tagout standard went into effect October 31, 1989 and should be followed when developing an abatement program. However there has been an administrative stay on enforcement until January 2, 1990.
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.304 A02
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $200
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $200
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 1989
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 1990
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 1990
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 1989
1910.38 A01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 1990
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 1989
1910.305 G01 I
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 1989
1910.305 J04 IIE
- Issued
- Nov 16, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 1989
More inspections at Unistream Plastics
View Unistream Plastics's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 18200394.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.