DUNMORE, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: G N B INC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of G N B INC in KEYSTONE INDUSTRIAL PARK, 1 DUNHAM DRIVE, DUNMORE, PA 18512 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 18224998.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- G N B INC
- Site address
- KEYSTONE INDUSTRIAL PARK, 1 DUNHAM DRIVE
- City
- DUNMORE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18512
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 177, DUNMORE, PA 18512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3691
- Employees
- 308
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
39 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $540 · Current $270 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) o fthe Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to pinch points created from the movement of mechanical lifting aids: a) Finishing Department - Employees operating the 10 floor manual lifting aid on the new line were exposed to a crushing hazard between the floor and the platform as the platform was descending, February 14, 1990. b) Plate Parting, COA, horse shoe, finishing - Employees operating autoquip lifting aids were exposed to pinch points generated between the 3 inch tip on the base of the unit and the work platform; the construction of the lifts was not in compliance with Commercial Standard CA202-56, Industrial Lifts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $270.00
- · Z (S) $540.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 16, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $540 · Current $440 Reduced
8302
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that wer causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to increased risk of cumulative trauma disorder(s) from the tasks that they were performing and administrative or engineering controls were not provided: a) Employees performing plate parting were required to continuously perform repetitive motion on the wrist: the evaluation of this repetitive motion task indicates that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal injuries. The injury and illness records for 1988 and 1990 documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS TO IMPLEMENT ENGINEERING AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 1) Identification of all current employees who experience symptoms generally associated with repetitive motion disorders. 2) Perform an ergonomic assessment of each operation to identify mechanical stressors which may be produced by the environment, tools, or work methods. 3) Automate the process to include automatic (mechanical) parting ofthe plates and in the interim: 4) Implementation of a medical surveillance and treatment program for employees exposed to repetitive motion hazards which includes the following: a) Pre-employment examinations with special attention to medical nerve distribution, muscular aberrations and wrist flexibility; including both strength and stamina testing and nerve pace testing along with a review of employee work histories relative to repetitive trauma disorders. b) Medical examinations and counseling of employees as soon as symptoms generally associated with repetitive trauma disorders are reported. Detailed examinations of each employees' specific work history should be performed, and medical treatment, including ice therapy, and exercise therapy, should be considered where appropriate. Employees should be alerted to the minimal effectveness of surgical interventions, especially when returning to a job with high risk factors, and to the use and limitations of wristbands or splints. c) Medical records should include descriptive diagnosis, specifying which muscles, tendons, and nerves are affected as well as treatments prescribed. d) Employees should be prohibited from returning to their former jobs following surgery until the work environment has been modifified to the extent that the risk of recurrent injury has been minimized. e) Follow-up of mild cases of impairment to ensure that medical treatment and/or job changes have been effective. Implementation of a workplace condition and awarenessprogram which should include the following elements: a) Instruction of employees in proper job task methods and the importance of musculoskeletal health and prevention of illnesses and injuries. b) Training of managers and engineers to understand the cause and means to prevent repetitive motion and stress illnesses. c) Implementation of an employee rotation program which assures all employees an equable task distribution. 5) Implementation of a work hardening program to condition employees who do not have the physical capabilities to perform their job tasks. Abatement Schedule Step 1 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering or administrative measures to control employee injury due to repetive motion tasks. Engineering controls to reduce musculoskeletal stresses include, but are not limited to job redesign. This plan shall include at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation. 1) Evaluation of the condition, locations and repetitive motion activities that the employees are performing at the onset of injuries. 2) Evaluation of applicable control measure(s). 3) Procurement installation and operation of selected control measures. ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE REPETITIVE MOTION DISORDERS. THIRY (30) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. Step 2 - Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administratve controls upon verification of their effectiveness in reducing the occurrence of repetitive motion injuries.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $440.00
- · I (S) $440.00
- · Z (S) $540.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 19, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $540 · Current $440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to increased risk of cumulative trauma disorder(s) from the tasks that they were performing and administrative or engineering controls were not provided: a) Cast on strap (COS) - An employee lifting 60lb bars of lead into the COS pot was exposed at 2.0 and 1.14 times the NIOSH limit on February 1, 1990. The evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to an increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries based upon studies of populations exposed to similar lifting conditions. The injury and illness records for 1988 and 1989 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. b) Battery charging line - Employees pushing series of batteries over the old plastic roller conveyors were exposed to an excessive musculoskeletal stress when the series would jam along the rail, resulting in five musculoskeletal injuries in 1989, February 2, 1990. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS TO IMPLEMENT ENGINEERING AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS WHICH INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 1) The establishment of a maintenance program to ensure the proper operation of the conveyor (Instance b). 2) Replace the plastic roller conveyors with metal roller type as utilized throughout th new conveyor section of the facility (Instance b). 3) Identification of all current employees who expierience symptoms generally associated with back injuries. 4) Perform an ergonomic assessment of each operation to identify mechanical stressors which may be produced by the environment, tools, or work methods. 5) Implementation of control measures to increase adjustability of position into the job and reduce awkward postures. (Example: adjust the horizontal and vertical load distances from the body. 6) Work place design parameters such as load location, start/end relationship, floor condition, body posture, keeping heavy objects off the floor, storing heavy objects at waist height, minimize the distance from the body, use a 2 person lift for heavy objects, use of lighter weight objects (total weight reduction of the object). (Instance a) 7) Provide mechanical lifting aids which may include automatic levelling devices, scissor lifts and lift tables, manipulators, or install bulk metering devices. (Instance a) 8) Conduct training sesions to familiarize workers with an appreciation of the types of movements and postures which precipitate back injuries 9) Implementation of a workplace education and awareness program aimed at the maintenance of musculoskeletal health and preventionof injuries. Specific efforts should be expended on identifying and reducing obstacles that prevent or deter a worker with symptomsfrom reporting them. 10)Implementation of a medical surveillance and treatment program for employees exposed to lifting hazards. This program should contain the following elements and be readily accessible to all employees working at high risk jobs: (Instance a) a) Pre-employment examinations with special attention to strength and aerobic capacity. (Note: to minimize abuse of such placement procedures it is necessary to identify the high risk jobs and quantifythe required job demands. Workers should be matched to jobs as function of the specific job demands and worker capacities). b) Provide medical examinations and counseling of employees as soon as symptons generally associated with back injuries are reported. c) Employees should be prohibited from returning to their former jobs following surgry until the work environment has been modified to the extent that the risk of recurrent injury has been minimized. d) Follow-up of cases to ensure that medical treatment and/or job changes have been effective. Abatement Schedule Step 1 - Effective administrative protection such as employees training, baseline health surveillance, job rotation, etc., shall be provided as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering or permanent administrative controls can be implemented which will reduce employee exposure to the hazard of musculoskeletal injuries. Step 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the Implementation of engineering or administrative measures to control employees injury due to manual lifting tasks. Engineering controls to reduce muculokeletal stresses include, but are not limited to job redesign, reduction of the horizontaland vertical load distance from the body, reduction of the lifting frequency, or weight, and use of mechanical lifting aids. This plan shall include at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation. 1) Evaluation of the conditions, locations and manual lifting activities that the employees are performing at the onset of musculoskeletal injuries. 2) Evaluation of applicable control measure(s). 3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measure(s). All PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKLPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS. THIRTY (30) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. Step 3 - Develop a rehabilitation program for injured workers. The program is expected to include exercise, building stamina, trainingin safe lifting techniques, work conditioning and demonstrationthat the worker is able to resume work. Step 4 - Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls. Where the lifting task analyses in NIOSH's Work Practices Guide for Manual Lifting has been utilized compliance will be achieved when the action level is met.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $440.00
- · Z (S) $540.00
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $180 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $180.00
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.37 J
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $180 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $180.00
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.106 D02 III
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $180 · Current $90 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $90.00
- · Z (S) $180.00
1910.106 D06 IV
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.106 D07 I
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
1910.106 D07 III
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
1910.106 E02 IIB2
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $170 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $170.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.106 E02 IVA
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $170 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $170.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.106 E06 II
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.120 L01 II
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.120 L03 I
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (S)
1910.151 C
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $450
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $350.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $260 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $260.00
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 19, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 19, 1990
1910.252 A02 IVC
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $350.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.1025 C01
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $630 · Current $530 Reduced
1591
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $530.00
- · Z (S) $630.00
1910.134 A02
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 21, 1990
1591
1910.1025 E01
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $630 · Current $530 Reduced
1591
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $530.00
- · I (S) $530.00
- · Z (S) $630.00
1910.1025 D01 II
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $260 Reduced
1591
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $260.00
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 1990
1591
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.1025 I04 IV
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 31, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360
1591
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $260 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $260.00
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.95 D02 II
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 31, 1990
8111
1910.95 G06
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 31, 1990
1910.95 G08 I
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 31, 1990
8111
1910.95 G08 IIA
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 31, 1990
8111
1910.95 G08 IIC
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 31, 1990
8111
1910.134 F02 I
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
1591
1910.303 F
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
1910.1025 J02 IB
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 26, 1990
1591
1910.1025 J03 IB
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 1990
1591
1910.1025 N01 IID
- Issued
- May 16, 1990
- Abate by
- May 31, 1990
1591
More inspections at G N B INC
View G N B INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 18224998.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.