INDIANOLA, MS —
OSHA Inspection: ALLEN CORPORATION DBA SOUTH FRESH FARMS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALLEN CORPORATION DBA SOUTH FRESH FARMS in RT. 1, BAIRD RD., INDIANOLA, MS 38751 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 18304204.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALLEN CORPORATION DBA SOUTH FRESH FARMS
- Site address
- RT. 1, BAIRD RD.
- City
- INDIANOLA
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 38751
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 762, INDIANOLA, MS 38751
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2092
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 18, 1991
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the risk of Cumulative Trauma Disorders (CTD) were further exposed to the risk of increased severity and/or reoccurance of the illnesses in that an effective ergonomics program was not implemented: (a) Kill Line and Fillet Area. Feasible abatement methods to correct the hazard may include, but not limited to the following: 1). Identification of all current employees experiencing symptoms generally associated with a cumulative trauma disorder or back injury. 2). Survey work areas and identify actions and stressors which may contribute to cumulative trauma disorders or back injuries. 3). Develop a training program and awarness program for employees and managers. 4). Develop a light duty program. 5). Develop a medical program for tracking cumulative trauma disorders and back injuries. Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to to control employee exposure to the hazardous conditions as referenced in this citation. This plan shall be submitted within the first ninety (90) days of the abatement period. Thereafter, ninety (90) day progress reports shall be submitted to the Area Director.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 18, 1991
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 1991
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform lifting and repeditive tasks which require various hand, wrist and arm postures, resulting in stressors likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders and back injuries and administrative and Engineering Controls were not implemented: (a) Kill Line and Fillet Area. (i) Headsaw Operators - Band Saw - While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited 1). Allow for work height adjustability. 2). Reduce the reach distance to the saw. 3). Put the fish in a fixture to eliminate tight gripping of fish. (ii) Rippers - While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1). Use a powered tool to make the rip cut. 2). Have the fish positioned in a trolley. 3). Use gloves that will provide the needed grip on the fish. 4). Use short blade knives where employees can hold the handle during ripping operations. (iii) Long Guns - While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1). Keep the area cleaner and less slimyso that the fish will be easier to grip. 2). Put a cutting edge on the long gun so that the points where the evisera are connected to the fish can be easily severed. 3). Have the fish in a stationary trolley and make the vacuum a hand tool. 4). Use gloves that will give workers the needed grip on the fish. 5). Lower the vacuum nozzle. 6). Use greater suction force in the vacuums. (iv) Skinners - While ultimate esponsibility for correcting the the hazards rests with the employer given his knoweldge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1). Have the fish in a stationary trolley and make the vacuum a hand tool. 2). Use gloves to make the gripping easier. 3). Allow for adjustability of work height. 4). Rinse fish before gripping. 5). Put the supply of fish to be skinned closer to the workers. (v) Fillet Department - While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1). Break the task down into a series of tasks to be performed by different workers to eliminate the excessive movement required to go from one cut to the next. 2). Provide a moveable fixture to hold the fish and introduce them to workers at the correct height and angle. 3). Provide different types of knives for making different cuts recognizing that no one knife will be appropriate for all of the different types of cuts made in the fillet task. 4). Experiment with alternate methods of filleting. One slow cut may be able to do the work of four quick cuts. 5). Develop a system so that workers always use a sharp knife. 6). Redesign the workplace so that workers can reach their supply of fish to be filleted without excessive reaches and twisting. 7). Provide for workstation height adjustability. 8). Provide workplace seating.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $525.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jul 18, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jul 18, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $500 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $250.00
- — Z (O) $500.00
More inspections at Allen Corporation DBA South Fresh Farms
View Allen Corporation DBA South Fresh Farms's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 18304204.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.