CEDARTOWN, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: CLUETT PEABODY & CO. INC. DIV OF BIDERMANN IND USA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CLUETT PEABODY & CO. INC. DIV OF BIDERMANN IND USA in 100 ADAMSON ROAD, CEDARTOWN, GA 30125 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 18343434.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLUETT PEABODY & CO. INC. DIV OF BIDERMANN IND USA
- Site address
- 100 ADAMSON ROAD
- City
- CEDARTOWN
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30125
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2321
- Employees
- 550
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 28, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $9,000 · Current $4,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1)of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that the following employees were exposed to cumulative trauma stressors of the hands, fists, arms, neck and back: a) Sewing machine operators and automated stitch operators regularly performing small parts and mid-assembly operations; i.e., runon sleeves, yokes bottom hems, folder fell, cuffs and collars. b) Heat set operators, pressers, buttoner, folders, and packers performing repetitive motion functions with less than thirty (30) seconds cycle. c) Utility people and instructors performing the same operations on an irregular basis. Feasible methods of abatement for these instances include, but are not limited to, the following: Establish a comprehensive ergonomic control program, including engineering and administrative control, and close medical surveillance, as described at the end of the citation. Replace current top switch collar machines with automated stitcher. Install automatic counting device on sewing machines to eliminate operator use of manual counters. Provide specialized training to sewing machine operators, automated stitch operators, instructors, utility workers, folders, buttoners, pressors, heatset provide necessary time for work harden and warm-up exercises for job activities involving significant cumulative trauma stressors. Investigate sit/stand options. Relocate/reposition the sewing machines so that the worker can sit erect and perform his/her tasks. If the sewing machine is canted to the right or left, the machine operator could center his/her shoulders, neck, and to be able to observe the active sewing area. As an alternative, if mirrors were placed on supports at the sides of the machine, the operator could observe the active sewing area by looking into the mirror. Change the angle of incline of the sewing machine by moving the neck-end backwards and angling the active sewing area upward, so that each worker can operate the machine while sitting with an erect position. Pad the edges of all sewing work stations subject to machine operators resting or supporting forearms. Change foot controls connected to mechanical rod to an electric switch which can be moved to fit variable employee positions, leg lengths, or used as knee control. This will allow additional use as knee control. This will allow additional use of swivel chairs. Elements of a Comprehensive Ergonomics control program In addition to specific abatement methods described in the instance descriptions, general methods of abatement for item 1-5 are necessary componets of a comprehensive health program for CTS. These feasible methods of abatement include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Conduct an ergonmic assessment, including worker provided information of each operation, to determine the stressors that are present. Identification of all current employees with symptoms generally associated with repetitive motion disorders. By using questionnaires and supporting examinations done by the plant nurses and/or doctors, determine the current health conditions of the plant workers. Rate operations according to CTS potential to support effective use of job rotation and light duty transfers. Redesign supervisor evaluations in accident reports of CTS to standardized and specify stressors involved. 2) Implement administrative control measures aimed at reducing the degree of repetitiveness of jobs. Specific recommendations include: Rotate employees between jobs requiring different types of motions. Require employee break periods at a frequency greater than two (2) ten (10) minute breaks per day for operations identified as high risk for repetitive strain injuries. Potentially restrict job transfers to high stressor jobs by employees suffering pain and impairment from CTS. Reevaluate existing work allowances and production standards with consideration of the economics of potential compensation costs for repetitive strain injuries at these high risk operations. Time study evaluations must be based on work activities emphasizing neutral postures and motions. Enrich job tasks performed so that completion time equals or exceeds 45 seconds. Vary job activities. 3) Implement control measures to increase adjustablity of position for the job and reduce awkward postures. The following specific methods should be considered at all the cited operations: Utilize spring loaded trimming scissors with plastic handles ergonomically designed to spread forces over the entire surface of the scissors grip throughout the plant. Provide ergonomically correct chairs. These chairs should be equpped with five legs and wheels, seat rotation, and seat and back adjustments that can be operated by levers or controls especially made for this purpose. The chairs shall be padded and the chair back should include a shaped support for the lumbar region of the back. Install thread saver attachments to reduce the amount of thread trimming necessary machine operators. Change foot controls connected to mechanical rod to an electric switch which can be moved to fit variable employee positions, leg lengths, or used as knee control. This will allow additional use of swivel chairs. Assure that the allowed lifting weights found in the National Instittue of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) "Work Practices Guide for Manual LIfting," March 1981, are followed. 4) Implement a workplace education and awareness program aimed at the maintenance of musculoskeletal health and prevention of injuries. Specific efforts should be expended identifying and reducing obstacles that prevent or deter a worker with symptoms from reporting them. Conduct training for workers, union representatives, maintenance, engineering and management, to make people aware of the following: a) Motions and postures that precipate back, shoulder, and neck strain. b) Motions and postures that lead to repetitive motion disorders of the shoulders, arm, elbows, wrists, hands, and fingers. Use video tapes to correct unsafe practices of employees involved in sewing. 5) Implementation of a medical surveillance and treatment program for employees exposed to repetitive motion hazards. This program should contain the following elements, and be readily accessible to all employees working at high-risk jobs: Program supervision and evalution by a single physician to promote consistent and correct treatments and to act as case manager. Pre-employment examinations. Medical examinations and counseling of employees as soon as symptoms generally associated with repetitive trauma disorders are reported. Detailed examinations of each employees' specific work history should be performed, and medical treatment, including ice therapy, anti- inflammatory medications and exercise therapy, i.e., work harding should be used and surgery delayed until after conservative treatment has been tried. Employees should be prohibited from returning to their former jobs following surgery until the work environment has been modified to the extent that the risk of recurrent injury has been minimized. Follow-up of mild cases of impairment to ensure that medical treatment and job changes have been affective. Contract doctor should make frequent visits to the worksite; twice a year and whenever major process changes are made. If light duty jobs are assigned to injured employees, doctors should recommend such jobs in concert with employees and management.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $4500.00
- · Z (W) $9000.00
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $300.00
- · Z (S) $300.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 18343434.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.