Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: BRASS FOUNDRY COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRASS FOUNDRY COMPANY in 713 S. W. ADAMS STREET, PEORIA, IL 61602 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 1926948.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Brass Foundry Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brass Foundry Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
713 S. W. ADAMS STREET
City
PEORIA
State
IL
ZIP
61602
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3366
Employees
65
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 F01 II

Other-than-serious 4 instances 65 exposed
Issued
May 1, 1986
Abate by
Jul 31, 1986
Recent events (2)
  • · A (O)
  • · Z (O)

5(a)(1)

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 1986
Abate by
May 16, 1986
Penalty
Initial $490 · Current $250 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
...the hazards of death from crushing injuries from being caught in
moving machinery inside the Ring sand muller. An inadequate lock out
procedure was not developed for employees required to enter the
muller for cleaning purposes.
Among other methods one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct the hazards is:
Equipment being repaired or serviced shall be isolated by locking out
electrical and/or fluid (air or liquid) energy power sources, and/or
lowering, blocking or cribbing or parts to prevent activation of
moving parts and electrical energization that could be hazardous to
the employees performing repair or maintenance work on or around such
on or around such equipment be provided with a padlock and shall be
in possession of the only key to the padlock.  If more than one
person is engaged in the repair or maintenance operations at one
time a padlock system must be arranged, and each person's lock must
be in place.  Only the individual will have a key to his/her padlock.
Where repair or maintenance operations require employees to be
involved with more than one piece of equipment at a time, and the
pieces of equipment cannot all be locked out at one source, each
employee must lock out at each source.  In addition to the lock out
system there must be accompanying tags or signs located on the
disconnecting means, and such tags or signs shall identify the
operation an prohibit the use of the equipment.  Supervisory
personnel shall monitor the lock out/tag out program for
effectiveness and employee adherence to it.
Employees shall be thoroughly trained in all aspects of the lock out/
tag out program including when and where to use the procedures, and
shall include hands-on training.  The program shall be set down, in
detail, in writing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $250.00
  • · Z (S) $490.00

5(a)(1)

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 17, 1986
Abate by
Jun 20, 1986
Penalty
Initial $420 · Current $215 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
...crushing/shear points between the lifting arms for the bucket and
the sides of the cab on the Owatonna 1700 Mustang end loader in the
aluminum melting area.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to install side guards to prevent any portion of
the employee's body from getting into crushing/shear points created by
lifting arms and the sides of the cab.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $215.00
  • · Z (S) $420.00

1910.1200 D06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 65 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 1986
Abate by
Apr 24, 1986

1910.1200 G02 VII

Other-than-serious 1 instance 65 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 1986
Abate by
Apr 8, 1986

1910.212 A01

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1986
Abate by
Apr 10, 1986
Penalty
Initial $210 · Current $105 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $105.00
  • · Z (S) $210.00

1910.215 A04

Serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1986
Abate by
Mar 15, 1986
Penalty
Initial $350 · Current $175 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $175.00
  • · Z (S) $350.00

1910.215 B09

Serious 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1986
Abate by
Mar 15, 1986

1910.242 B

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1986
Abate by
Mar 24, 1986
Penalty
Initial $420 · Current $210 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $210.00
  • · Z (S) $420.00

1910.243 C03

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1986
Abate by
Apr 10, 1986
Penalty
Initial $280 · Current $140 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $140.00
  • · Z (S) $280.00

1910.304 F05 V

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1986
Abate by
Mar 17, 1986
Penalty
Initial $280 · Current $140 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $140.00
  • · Z (S) $280.00

1910.157 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 65 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1986
Abate by
Apr 30, 1986
Recent events (2)
  • · P (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.304 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1986
Abate by
Mar 18, 1986

View Brass Foundry Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA's own view of this case can be found through its Establishment Search.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.