PLANO, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: SANDWICH IRON FOUNDRY INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SANDWICH IRON FOUNDRY INC in WEST MAIN STREET, PLANO, IL 60545 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 2353233.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANDWICH IRON FOUNDRY INC
- Site address
- WEST MAIN STREET
- City
- PLANO
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60545
- Mailing
- WEST MAIN STREET, PLANO, IL 60545
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3321
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1985
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $195 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being: a) struck or crushed by the moving hoist platform while walking into or out of the cupola pouring room; b) caught or crushed between parts of the hoist platform and its surrounding or supporting structure while riding as a passenger on the platform; c) traumatically injured while riding as a passenger should the hoist platform fall to the bottom landing; d) traumatically injured as a result of falls down the hoistway or as a result of objects falling down the hoistway from the upper landing or hoistway. Employees transported barrow loads of coke, limestone, and scrap iron while riding and unenclosed material hoist platform from the cupola pouring floor at ground level 15 feet upward in an open hoistway to the cupola charging floor, using an underslung material hoist as a drive mechanism. No part of this hoistway, hoistway structure, hoist platform or accessory and control equipment met the accepted engineering practice for construction, installation, operation, testing, or maintenance as set forth in the American National Safety Code for Elevators, Escalators and Moving Walks, ANSI a 17.1-1982, and particularly those parts of this standard dealing with: a) hoistways, hoistway enclosures, and related structures; b) machinery and equipment for electric elevators; c) driving machines, terminal stopping devices, operating devices, control equipment, hoisting ropes and their connections; d) the testing, inspection, and maintenance of all parts of an elevator and its appurtenances when used for personnel. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to reduce these hazards is to assure that: 1) effective immediately, employees be prohibited from using the material hoist as an elevator for carrying people; 2) fence or enclose both the lower landings and the upper landing at all times with barriers or gates interlocked with the hoist's power supply so that the hoist cannot move while any employee is in the lower landing area or while the material hoist platform is being loaded or unloaded; 3) the hoist platform and the hoistway are sufficiently enclosed so that materials cannot fall either from the hoist platform down the hoistway or from the cupola charging floor down into the hoistway and so that no one outside of the hoistway can be exposed to any of its moving parts and machinery; 4) the methodology or process is changed so that it no longer is necessary for any one employee to go repeatedly from ground level to the copola charging floor and back again during the cupola charging process and so that when any such travel is necessary, a stairway or some other safe alternative be used.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $195.00
- · Z (S) $600.00
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 1985
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $130 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $130.00
- · Z (S) $400.00
1910.243 C01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $230 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $230.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.243 C03
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 1985
1910.304 F05 V
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $130 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $130.00
- · Z (S) $400.00
1910.213 H01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 1985
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.213 H04
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
1910.213 H05
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 1985
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
1910.215 B02
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
1910.215 D01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
1910.252 E02 III
- Issued
- Nov 18, 1985
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 1985
More inspections at Sandwich Iron Foundry INC
View Sandwich Iron Foundry INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA's own view of this case can be found through its Establishment Search.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.