OMAHA, NE ·
OSHA Inspection: J F O'NEIL PACKING COMPANY
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of J F O'NEIL PACKING COMPANY in 3601 L ST, OMAHA, NE 68107 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 2477487.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J F O'NEIL PACKING COMPANY
- Site address
- 3601 L ST
- City
- OMAHA
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2011
- Employees
- 89
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 1985
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 1985
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $350.00
- · Z (S) $700.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 26, 1985
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 1985
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $200.00
- · Z (S) $400.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 26, 1985
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 1985
- Penalty
- Initial $9,000 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being caught in the rotating parts of machinery during cleaning operations. Feasible and acceptable abatement methods (among others) to correc the hazard are: (1) structured training of employees as to the hazards associated with the clean-up operation; (2) supervision of those employees to ensure the practices prescribed in the training are being followed; (3) implementation of mechanical safety concepts, i.e., Zero Mechanical State (ZMS) or Zero Energy State (ZES). These concepts ensure the lockout of the prime driving force of a machine and provides a basis for training operators of the machine of all possible mechanical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900.00
- · Z (W) $9000.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA's own view of this case can be found through its Establishment Search.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.