ROBSTOWN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: PADRE DRILLING COMPANY, INC. RIG #8
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of PADRE DRILLING COMPANY, INC. RIG #8 in CHARBA #1, COUNTY RD. 34, 5-1/2 MILES SOUTH OF, ROBSTOWN, TX 78380 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300181989.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PADRE DRILLING COMPANY, INC. RIG #8
- Site address
- CHARBA #1, COUNTY RD. 34, 5-1/2 MILES SOUTH OF
- City
- ROBSTOWN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78380
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 9925, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78469
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1381
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fire and explosion: Employee was exposed to the hazard of fire and explosion due to the improper rigging of the Geronimo Emergency Escape Line and installation of the Geronimo Emergency Escape Device on the Geronimo Emergency Escape Line due to: a.Geronimo Emergency Escape Device was rigged approximately ten (10) feet above the floor of the pipe racking board which is approximately seventy (70) feet above ground level with no means of safe access to the Geronimo Emergency Escape Device, i.e. employee would have to climb the East derrick leg in order to use the Geronimo Emergency Escape Device. b.The Geronimo Emergency Escape Line was installed improperly, i.e. in such a manner which was too steep and which did not allow for adequate slack in order to allow the employee with enough travel distance in order to stop twenty (20) to twenty-five (25) feet prior to the anchoring point as recommended by Geronimo Manufacturing, Inc. c.The Geronimo Emergency Escape Line was anchored improperly, i.e. the Geronimo Emergency Escape Line was wrapped around an upright steel rod on the West end of the skid with two (2) half hitches and then wrapped around the roll bar of the skid with there being no Crosby clamps installed on the live end of the escape line. This occurred on or about June 18, 1996 on Padre Drilling Company, Inc., Rig Number 8. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be installation of a properly rigged and secured emergency descent device or other satisfactory auxiliary means of egress, such as specified in Section 5, Sub-Section 5.7, Paragraph 5.7.l of American Petroleum Institute (API) RP 54-92, page 12. Essential elements of this procedure would include: 1.Staking out a securely anchored one-half inch wire rope escape line attached to the derrick or mast so as to provide a ready and convenient means of escape from the Derrickman's working platform. 2.The escape line route is to be kept clear of obstructions. 3.A safety device is to be provided to permit fast emergency exit from the Derrickman's working platform to a safe place. 4.The tension on the escape line is to be periodically checked and adjusted to assure a safe landing and to allow the Derrickman to stop twenty (20) to twenty-five (25) feet from the anchor point. 5.The ground anchor point of the escape line is to be located a minimum lateral distance from the derrick or mast equal to the height above ground level to the point where the escape line is fastened.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by: Employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by: a.Rotary hose with the hammer connection union and four (4) inch nipple falling from the standpipe as a result of not having implemented at least a semi-annual inspection program or procedure which would require the four (4) inch nipple which threads into the gooseneck at the standpipe be removed and the threads inspected at both ends and then rethreaded into the standpipe gooseneck. b.The employer failed to secure the wire rope/chain to the Manufacturer provided lug on the gooseneck of the rotary swivel for securing the upper part of the rotary hose, hammer connection union and the four (4) inch nipple to prevent them from falling. API Spec 8A, Eleventh Edition, May l, 1985, Page 8, Section 5, SubSection 5.4, Paragraph 5.4.l. "Swivels having gooseneck connections of two (2) inches and larger shall be provided with a suitable lug containing a l-l/8 inch hole to accommodate the clevis of a chain having a breaking strength of 16,000 pounds. The location of the lug is at the choice of the manufacturer. API Specification 8C (Spec 8C), First Edition, January l, 1990, Supplement l (January l, 1992), Page 26, Section 7, Sub-Section 7.9, Paragraph 7.9.6 "Gooseneck connections shall be provided with a suitable lug containing an l-l/2 inch (28mm) diameter hole to accommodate the clevis of a chain having a breaking strength of 16,000 pounds (7250kg). The location of the lug is at the choice of the manufacturer." Paragraph 7.10.5 "Rotary hose safety chain attachments shall meet the requirements of Section 7.9.6. c.Fragmented parts of the Oteco safety relief valve rupturing, i.e. Oteco safety relief valve had not been maintained or inspected to determine its operability and integrity in accord with the requirement API RP54-92. API RP54-92, Page 20, Section 8, Sub-Section 8.13, Paragraph 8.13.3, "In normal operations, pumps, piping, hoses, valves, and other fittings shall not be operated at pressures greater than their rated working pressure and shall be maintained in good operating condition. Test pressures shall not exceed the design test pressure. Pumps, piping, hoses and safety relief devices shall be of a design that meets requirements of the operating conditions to be encountered."API RP54-92, Page 20, Section 8, Sub-Section 8.13, Paragraph 8.13.4 "Safety relief devices shall be set to discharge at a pressure equal to or less than the rated working pressure of any pump, piping, hose or fitting that the devices protect." Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement a maintenance and inspection program as addressed in: API RP54-92, Section 8, Sub-Section 8.2, Paragraph 8.2.l, Page 16; Section 8, Sub-Section 8.13, Paragraph 8.13.3 and Paragraph 8.13.4, Page 20; API Specification 7, Thirty-seventh Edition, August l, 1990, Section 17, Paragraph 17.7, Page 56; API Spec 8A, Eleventh Edition, May l, 1985, Page 8, Section 5, Sub-Section 5.4; API RP8B, Fourth Edition, April 1979, Page 8-10, Figure 4.11, Page C-10; API Specification 8C (Spec 8C), First Edition, January l, 1990, Supplement l (January l, 1992), Page 26, Section 7, Sub-Section 7.9, Paragraph 7.9.6 and Paragraph 7.10.5. The International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) Drilling Manual, Section H4, Page l, ROTARY HOSE AND SWIVELS INSPECTIONS which states., "All hoisting tools on the rotary drill rig must have daily inspections followed by monthly and quarterly (more frequent if severe operating conditions or loading is imposed) shutdown inspections." and "in normal operations, pumps, piping, hoses, valves and other fittings shall not be operated at pressures greater than their rated working pressure and shall be maintained in good operating condition. Test pressures shall not exceed the design test pressure. Pumps, piping, hoses and safety relief devices shall be of a design that meets requirements of the operating conditions to be encountered, such as specified by API RP54-92, Page 20, Paragraph 8.13.3." This alleged condition occurred on or about June 18, 1996.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1250.00 · Current $750.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.141 C01 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $750.00 · Current $450.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $450.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $750.00 · Current $450.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $450.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $750.00 · Current $450.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $450.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2500.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.307 B02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.242 A
- Issued
- Abate by
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
SCHENECTADY, NY—2012-01-05 00:00:00
BRUCE D. BOWMAN
BILLINGS, MT—2005-01-25 00:00:00
KGC, INC.
ROCKAWAY, NJ—2002-12-31 00:00:00
ROCKAWAY BOROUGH DPW
FOREST CITY, NC—2002-12-31 00:00:00
HARRY BRICKEY DBA A. BRICKEY CEILING COMPANY
EDGERTON, KS—2002-12-31 00:00:00
SUDDEN BOND INDUSTRIES
More inspections in TX
RICHMOND, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
CORNELIUS NURSERIES, INC.
HOUSTON, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
HOLLOWAY HOUSTON, INC.
BONHAM, TX—2026-07-17 00:00:00
VOLUNTARY PURCHASING GROUPS, INC.
SNYDER, TX—2026-07-16 00:00:00
RNWBL
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16 00:00:00
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300181989.