Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IDAHO METAL FABRICATION CO., INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of IDAHO METAL FABRICATION CO., INC. in 400 NORTH MINIDOKA AVENUE, BURLEY, ID 83318 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300207636.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Idaho Metal Fabrication CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Idaho Metal Fabrication CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
400 NORTH MINIDOKA AVENUE
City
BURLEY
State
ID
ZIP
83318
Mailing
POST OFFICE BOX 696, BURLEY, ID 83318
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3443
Employees
25
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

16 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 7 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 26, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to crushing injuries from possible overhead
structure/hoist failure:
(a)New/West Shop:  On or about 11 February 1998, and at times prior
thereto,
the hook for the Ingersoll-Rand 2-ton electric hoist was not inspected on a
frequent and periodic basis in accordance with the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Safety Standards for Cableways, Cranes,
Derricks, Hoists, Hooks, Jacks, and Slings, ASME B30.10a-1996, paragraphs
10-1.2.1.2 and 10-12.1.3
(b)  New/West Shop:  On or about 11 February 1998, and at times prior
thereto,
the Ingersoll-Rand 2-ton electric hoist was not inspected on a frequent and
periodic basis in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME) Safety Standards for Cableways, Cranes, Derricks, Hoists,
Hooks, Jacks, and Slings, ASME B30.16b-1995, paragraphs 16-2.2.1.2 and
16-2.2.1.3.
(c)New/West Shop:  On or about 11 February 1998, and at times prior
thereto,
the overhead support structure for the Ingersoll-Rand 2-ton electric hoist
was
not inspected on a frequent and periodic basis in accordance with the
American
Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Safety Standards for Overhead and
Gantry Cranes (Top Running Bridge, Single Girder, Underhung Hoist), ASME
B30.17-1992, paragraphs 17-2.1.2 and 17-2.1.3.
(d)New/West Shop:  On or about 11 February 1998, and at times prior
thereto,
the screw pin shackle supporting the Ingersoll-Rand 2-ton electric hoist
mounted on the bridge truck on the  overhead structure was not secured from
vibrating loose by an approved method, such as, but not limited to, mousing
the screw pen to the shackle or using a bolt cotter pen, in accordance
with the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Safety Standards for
Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running Bridge, Single Girder, Underhung
Hoist), ASME B30.17-1992, paragraphs 17-2.1.3.
(e)New/West Shop:  On or about 11 February 1998, and at times prior
thereto,
the nylon locking nuts  were not sufficiently tightened to the bolts of
the
bridge truck for the Ingersoll-Rand 2-ton electric hoist, in accordance
with the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Safety Standards for
Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running Bridge, Single Girder, Underhung
Hoist), ASME B30.17-1992, paragraphs 17-2.1.3.
(f)New/West Shop:  On or about 11 February 1998, and at times prior
thereto,
the nylon locking nuts  were not sufficiently tightened to the bolts of
the girder
trucks supporting the bridge for the Ingersoll-Rand 2-ton electric hoist,
in
accordance with the  American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Safety Standards for Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running Bridge,
Single Girder, Underhung Hoist), ASME B30.17-1992, paragraphs 17-2.1.3.
(g)New/West Shop:  On or about 11 February 1998, and at times prior
thereto,
the supporting structure and the Ingersoll-Rand 2-ton electric hoist did
not
have a record documenting that an appropriate rated load test had been
performed, in accordance with the  American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME) Safety Standards for Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running
Bridge, Single Girder, Underhung Hoist), ASME B30.17-1992, paragraphs 17-
2.2.2.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard
is to install, inspect, and maintain overhead structure and hoist in
accordance with the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.10, B30.16 and B.30.17.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.110 E04 III

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Apr 16, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 26, 1998
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Penalty
Initial $375
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $375.00

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 26, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Penalty
Initial $300
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $300.00

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 01 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 26, 1998
Penalty
Initial $225
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $225.00

1910.253 E05 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 26, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.334 A02 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1998
Abate by
Mar 20, 1998
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

View Idaho Metal Fabrication CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300207636.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.