STOCKHOLM, SD ·
OSHA Inspection: NASSAU FARMERS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NASSAU FARMERS ELEVATOR COMPANY in NORTH MAIN STREET, STOCKHOLM, SD 57264 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300238250.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NASSAU FARMERS ELEVATOR COMPANY
- Site address
- NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- STOCKHOLM
- State
- SD
- ZIP
- 57264
- Mailing
- 301 FIRST AVENUE, NASSAU, MN 56257
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4221
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $188 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) Employees were exposed to potential fall hazards and crushing hazards while operating a manual manlift due to a lack of fall protection. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to install guardrails on the manlift car. (b) Employees were exposed to crushing hazards while working near the main elevator manlift due to the lack of a guardrail system with a gate around the base. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to install a guardrail system with a gate around the base of the manlift. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $187.50
- · Z (S) $750.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $188 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $187.50
- · Z (S) $750.00
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $113 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $112.50
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.272 J02 II
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $188 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $187.50
- · Z (S) $750.00
1910.272 O01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 1999
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 1999
1910.272 D
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 1999
1910.272 E01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 1999
1910.272 J01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 1999
1910.272 M01
- Issued
- Mar 5, 1999
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 1999
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in SD
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300238250.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.