HANNAH, ND ·
OSHA Inspection: HANNAH FARMERS COOP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HANNAH FARMERS COOP in ELEVATOR ROAD, HANNAH, ND 58239 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300244886.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HANNAH FARMERS COOP
- Site address
- ELEVATOR ROAD
- City
- HANNAH
- State
- ND
- ZIP
- 58239
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 147 C/O WALES ELEVATOR, WALES, ND 58281
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4221
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $188 · Current $188
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: (a) Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while operating the manlift due to the lack of a guardrail on the manlift car. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to install a guardrail system on the manlift car. (b) Employees were exposed to a crushing hazard while working near the manlift due to lack of a guardrail around the base of the manlift. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard would be to install a guardrail system with a gate around the base of the manlift. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $187.50
- · Z (S) $187.50
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $113 · Current $113
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $112.50
- · Z (S) $112.50
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
- Penalty
- Initial $113 · Current $113
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $112.50
- · Z (S) $112.50
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
1910.219 I02
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
1910.272 J02 II
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2001
- Abate by
- May 7, 2001
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in ND
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 300244886.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.