CARLISLE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA in 1818 STERRETTS GAP AVENUE, CARLISLE, PA 17013 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300411162.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA
- Site address
- 1818 STERRETTS GAP AVENUE
- City
- CARLISLE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 17013
- Mailing
- 4300 INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, CAMP HILL, PA 17011
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4212
- Employees
- 300
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 25, 2000
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by refuse collection vehicles operating in reverse: (a)Sterretts Gap Avenue, Carlisle, Pennsylvania - Employees ride on the step(s) of refuse collection vehicle(s) during reverse operation, thereby being exposed to being struck by the backing vehicle. Methods (i.e. route observations) used to ensure proper use of the equipment, including adherence to safe practices were deficient, as occurred on November 29, 1999. Among other feasible and useful abatement methods to correct this hazard is to comply with American National Standard Institute (ANSI) Z245.1, "Mobile Refuse Collection and Compaction Equipment - Safety Requirements", Section 6.2.4, Vehicles Equipped with Riding Steps which states, "Operators/employees of any vehicle equipped with riding steps shall be responsible for ensuring that no persons ride on steps when the vehicle is backing up, when the vehicle is exceeding 10 mi/hr. or operating in reverse, or when the distance travelled exceeds 2/10 mile." Additionally, ANSI Z245.1, Section 6.1(b) which states, "The employer shall be responsible for monitoring the employee's operation of equipment and taking appropriate action to ensure proper use of the equipment, including adherence to safe practices". VERIFICATION REQUIREDTION
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 25, 2000
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by hazards from using inoperative or damaged equipment: (a)Refuse Truck #302288 - The rear riding step located on the driver's side was damaged, thereby exposing employees to falls from the step. (b)Refuse Truck #302264 - The rear riding step located on the passenger's side measured twenty five (25) inches from the ground to step level, thereby exposing employees to falls from the step. (c)Refuse Truck #302289 - The rear riding step(s) on the passenger's and driver's sides were damaged, thereby exposing employees to falls from the steps. (d)Refuse Truck #302287 - The rear riding step(s) on the passenger's and driver's sides were damaged, thereby exposing employees to falls from the steps. Among other feasible and useful abatement methods to correct the above listed hazards is to repair the damaged steps and comply with American National Standard Institute (ANSI) Z245.1 "Mobile Refuse Collection and Compaction Equipment - Safety Requirements", Section 7.1.10, Riding Steps, which states, "If provided, riding steps shall have a slip resistant surface and be self cleaning, be capable of supporting 500 pound at the point furthest from its point of attachment, be mounted not more than twenty four (24) inches above the road surface, have a depth of at least eight (8) inches and provide a minimum of two hundred twenty (220) square inches of surface area, and be located behind the rearmost axle of the vehicle, but shall not extend beyond the rearmost structural portion of the vehicle except as described in 7.2.2.4. (e)Refuse Truck #302288 - The light over the right side of the hopper was not working, thereby exposing employees to injuries resulting from dimly lit conditions. Among other feasible and useful abatement methods to correct the above hazard is to repair the light or provide a secondary means of illumination (flashlights) to employees. (f)Refuse Truck #302288 - The buzzer signal pushbutton(s) located on either side of the tailgate were not working, thereby exposing employees (helpers) to injuries resulting from not being able to effectively communicate with the driver. These injuries may include but are not limited to being struck by an adjacent vehicle or structure while the employee is riding on the step in forward gear. (g)Refuse Truck #302287 - The buzzer signal pushbutton(s) located on either side of the tailgate were not working, thereby exposing employees (helpers) to injuries resulting from not being able to effectively communicate with the driver. These injuries may include but are not limited to being struck by an adjacent vehicle or structure while the employee is riding on the step in forward gear. (h)Refuse Truck #302289 - The buzzer signal pushbutton(s) located on either side of the tailgate were not working, thereby exposing employees (helpers) to injuries resulting from not being able to effectively communicate with the driver. These injuries may include but are not limited to being struck by an adjacent vehicle or structure while the employee is riding on the step in forward gear. (i)Refuse Truck #302273 - The buzzer signal pushbutton(s) located on either side of the tailgate were not working, thereby exposing employees (helpers) to injuries resulting from not being able to effectively communicate with the driver. These injuries may include but are not limited to being struck by an adjacent vehicle or structure while the employee is riding on the step in forward gear. (j)Refuse Truck #302283 - The buzzer signal pushbutton(s) located on either side of the tailgate were not working, thereby exposing employees (helpers) to injuries resulting from not being able to effectively communicate with the driver. These injuries may include but are not limited to being struck by an adjacent vehicle or structure while the employee is riding on the step in forward gear. Among other feasible and useful abatement methods to correct the above listed hazard is to operate the equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions contained in Leach 2RII Packmaster Operators Manual. (k)Recycle Truck #503347 - The video camera/monitoring system (CCTV) was not working, thereby exposing employees to injuries resulting from contacting moving vehicles and/or structures. (l)Truck #100376 - The video camera/monitoring system (CCTV) was not working, thereby exposing employees to injuries resulting from contacting moving vehicles and/or structures. (m)Truck #500683 (Old #1142) - The video camera/monitoring system (CCTV)was not working, thereby exposing employees to injuries resulting from contacting moving vehicles and/or structures. (n)Truck #500673 (Old #1141) - The video camera/monitoring system (CCTV) was not working, thereby exposing employees to injuries resulting from contacting moving vehicles and/or structures. Among other feasible and useful abatement methods to correct the above listed hazard is to repair or replace defective equipment. VERIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THE ABOVE LISTED ITEMSD
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.132 C
- Issued
- May 25, 2000
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.145 C03
- Issued
- May 25, 2000
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $2000.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- May 25, 2000
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2000
- Penalty
- Initial $50,000 · Current $44,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (U) $44000.00
- — Z (W) $50000.00
More inspections at Waste Management of Central Pennsylvania
View Waste Management of Central Pennsylvania's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300411162.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.