Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RUDOLPH LABRANCHE INC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of RUDOLPH LABRANCHE INC in 394 N. MAIN ST., FRANKLIN, NH 03235 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300440773.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rudolph Labranche INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rudolph Labranche INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
394 N. MAIN ST.
City
FRANKLIN
State
NH
ZIP
03235
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
4231
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Apr 28, 1997
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to crushing injuries due to overloading of crane supporting
structures:
a.Service Area - The adequacy and capacity of the supporting structure for
the 1-
ton jib crane was not known. A feasible method of abatement would be to
have
the supporting structure checked by an engineer and limit the cranes
capacity to
correspond to the engineer's recommendation.
b.Service Area - The adequacy and capacity of the supporting structure for
the 1/2-
ton jib crane was not known. A feasible method of abatement would be to
have
the supporting structure checked by an engineer and limit the crane
capacity to
correspond to the engineer's recommendation.
c.Service Area - Employees using the lifting cradle for forklift batteries
were
exposed to possible crushing injuries due to the capacity of the lifting
cradle not
being known. One feasible method of abatement would be to have a lifting
cradle
designed and constructed with ample capacity to lift expected loads such as
forklift batteries.

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Apr 28, 1997
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Apr 28, 1997
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Apr 28, 1997

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Apr 28, 1997
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750

1910.307 B

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Apr 28, 1997
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750

1910.304 F04

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Mar 20, 1997

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Mar 20, 1997

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 1997
Abate by
Mar 20, 1997

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300440773.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.