PLYMOUTH, NH —
OSHA Inspection: SOLON MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SOLON MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 231 MAIN ST., PLYMOUTH, NH 03264 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300445301.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOLON MANUFACTURING COMPANY
- Site address
- 231 MAIN ST.
- City
- PLYMOUTH
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03264
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 280, PLYMOUTH, NH 03264
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2499
- Employees
- 94
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $55,000 · Current $20,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to pinching and crushing injuries caused by handling, stacking, moving, and lifting bolts of birch wood, some in excess of 200 pounds. a.Woodroom - Employees were lifting bolts of wood up to and greater than 200 pounds and stacking them on a cart,loading them onto debarking machine, lifting them off the debarking machine and loading them onto another cart, pushing carts into steam kiln, stacking them in the steam kiln from the floor level to 5 feet high and then lifting them off the steam kiln racks and loading them back onto carts, and lifting bolts from cart to chain conveyor to be transported to second floor. b.Lathe room, cart loader - Employee was removing bolts of wood from the chain conveyor and manually loading them onto carts and pushing the carts to the lathe area. c.Lathe room, lathe loader - Employees were manually lifting the bolts of wood from the carts and loading them onto the lathes. d.Coe lathe - Employee was manually lifting bolts of wood from cart and loading them onto lathe. Among other methods, acceptable methods to abate the hazard include: 1.Use of debarking machines that would debark the entire log to eliminate the need to handle the bolts for debarking. 2.Use of Conveyor system to transport the bolts from the saw to loading area. 3.Use of mechanical assist to load bolts onto racks. 4.Use of racks instead of carts so bolts can be transported into and out of steam kilns using a fork truck. 5.Install elevator to take racks from first floor wood room to second floor lathe room and eliminate chain conveyor. 6.Install automatic feeder on lathes so that eliminate manual loading and unloading of bolts on lathe. 7.Require use of hoist for Coe lathe or install automatic feed. 8.Use mechanical assist to move bolts from racks to lathes. STEP 1:SUBMIT TO THE AREA DIRECTOR A WRITTEN, DETAILED PLAN OF ABATEMENT OUTLINING A SCHEDULE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENGINEERING AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES TO CONTROL EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE TO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL HANDLING AS REFERENCED IN THIS CITATION. THIS PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, TARGET DATES FOR THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS WHICH MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ABATEMENT DATES REQUIRED BY THIS CITATION: (1)EVALUATION OF ENGINEERING/ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OPTIONS; (2)SELECTION OF OPTIMUM CONTROL METHODS AND COMPLETION OF DESIGN; (3)PROCUREMENT, INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF SELECTED CONTROL MEASURES; AND (4)TESTING AND ACCEPTANCE OR MODIFICATION/REDESIGN OF CONTROLS. NOTE: ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A COMPETENT, TECHNICALLY QUALIFIED PERSON. NINETY (90) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP 2:ABATEMENT SHALL HAVE BEEN COMPLETED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FEASIBLE ENGINEERING AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS UPON VERIFICATION OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN ACHIEVING COMPLIANCE. (Specific abatement documentation is required.)ion
Recent events (3)
- — P (W) $20000.00
- — I (W) $20000.00
- — Z (W) $55000.00
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Jul 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 1998
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Jul 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 1998
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 1998
More inspections at Solon Manufacturing Company
View Solon Manufacturing Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300445301.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.