Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: PUBLIC STEEL INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PUBLIC STEEL INC in 515 N PHILADELPHIA, AMARILLO, TX 79105 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300574340.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Public Steel INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Public Steel INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PUBLIC STEEL INC
Site address
515 N PHILADELPHIA
City
AMARILLO
State
TX
ZIP
79105
Mailing
P.O. BOX 2444, AMARILLO, TX 79105
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3499
Employees
11
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

12 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 5 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Oct 7, 1997
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the condition(s) listed below:
515 N Philadelphia, Amarillo, TX., on or about August 13, 1997, it was
determined that
employees are required to lift heavy loads of extruded steel tubing and
other types of steel
products using overhead underhung cranes.  The employer has 5 cranes, 4
inside and 1 outside.
Cranes are marked with manufactures load limits and are; 1 ton (1 inside),
2 ton (3 inside) and
5 ton (1 outside); however, it could not be determined when or if a load
rate test, as required
by ANSI B30.11.1973, section 11-2.2 - Testing, had been performed since
cranes were installed,
reported to be over 20 years ago, because records were not available.
Additionally, it could not
be determined if "frequent" and "periodic" inspections of the cranes were
being performed as
required in section 11-2.1 - Inspection, because written, dated and signed
inspection reports and
records were not being maintained as prescribed in section 11-2.1.5 -
Inspection Records.  As
evidenced by the severe distortion of several hooks, the safety of the
equipment is questionable.
The only reported maintenance was when a crane did not work properly, then
it
was repaired;
however, those records were not available. This exposed employees to the
hazards associated
with a catastrophic failure of an overhead underhung crane while under
load and injuries
including but not limited to contusions, concussions, bone fractures and
death.
Among others, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be to
seek outside
professional help for the certification and weight testing of installed
cranes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $300.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 5 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Oct 7, 1997
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized
hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to the condition(s) listed below:
515 N Philadelphia, Amarillo, TX., on or about August 13, 1997, it was
determined that
employees are required to lift heavy loads of extruded steel tubing and
other types of steel
products using overhead underhung cranes.  The employer has 5 cranes in
use, 4 inside and 1
outside.  Cranes are marked with manufacturers load limits of; 1 ton (1
inside), 2 ton (3 inside)
and 5 ton (1 outside).  It is apparent that required "frequent" and
"periodic" inspection of hooks
as outlined in ASME B30.10.1993, section 10-1.2 - Inspection, Testing and
Maintenance, are
not being accomplished, because of following deficiencies:
1) Crane #1, located in the southeast end on the south side of the south
section of the two
section building is rated by the manufacture as 2 ton and is marked
accordingly.  The hook
showed evidence of increased throat opening, an indication of picking up
loads which exceeded
its weight limitations, thereby over stressing the hook.  Additionally,
the hook was designed for
use with a safety clip; however, the clip was missing.  Loads are being
lifted using slings and
chains and would require a safety clip to be installed.
2) Crane #2, located in the southeast end on the north side of the south
section of the two section
building is rated by the manufacture as 1 ton and is marked accordingly.
The hook showed
evidence of increased throat opening, an indication of picking up loads
which exceeded its
weight limitations, thereby over stressing the hook.  Additionally, the
hook was designed for use
with a safety clip; however, the clip was missing.  Loads are being lifted
using slings and chains
and would require a safety clip to be installed.
3) Crane #3, located in the southeast end on the south side of the north
section of the two section
building is rated by the manufacture as 2 ton and is marked accordingly.
The
hook showed
evidence of increased throat opening, an indication of picking up loads
which exceeded its
weight limitations, thereby over stressing the hook.  Additionally, the
hook was designed for use
with a safety clip; however, the clip was missing.  Loads are being lifted
using slings and chains
and would require a safety clip to be installed.
4) Crane #4, located in the southeast end on the north side of the north
section of the two section
building is rated by the manufacture as 2 ton and is marked accordingly.
The hook was
designed for use with a safety clip; however, with the exception of a very
small piece of hinge
section, the clip was missing.  Loads are being lifted using slings and
chains and would require
a safety clip to be installed.
5) Crane #5, located outside, northeast of the two section building is
rated by the manufacture
as 5 ton and is marked accordingly.  The hook was designed for use with a
safety clip; however,
the clip was missing.  Loads are being lifted using slings and chains and
would require a safety
clip to be installed.
This exposed employees to the hazards of being struck by a dropped load
due to hook failure
or disengagement of a sling/chain, including but not limited to
contusions, concussions, bone
fractures and death.
Among others, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be to
establish an
inspection, testing and maintenance program as outlined in the applicable
ANSI/ASME
Standards.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 16, 1997
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $300.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 30, 1997
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $300.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 24, 1997

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 11, 1997

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Oct 22, 1997
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $300.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 05 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 23, 1997

1910.303 B01 III

Serious Gravity 05 6 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 16, 1997
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $300.00
  • · Z (S) $1050.00

1910.305 B01

Serious Gravity 02 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 24, 1997
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $300.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1904.2 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 3 instances
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 23, 1997

1910.212 B

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 1997
Abate by
Sep 16, 1997

View Public Steel INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300574340.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.