Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SUPREME BUILDING MAINTENANCE CORPORATION

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of SUPREME BUILDING MAINTENANCE CORPORATION in 132 WEST 65TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10023 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 300618246.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Supreme Building Maintenance Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Supreme Building Maintenance Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
132 WEST 65TH STREET
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10023
Mailing
99 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10016
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
7349
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 1999
Abate by
Jan 25, 1999
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to being struck by tipping or falling machinery:
a)On or before July 13, 1998, on the roof, employees who installed a
powered
platform for building maintenance on its track did not lock the removable
track
section in place after installing the unit.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
Among others, a feasible method to eliminate or to materially reduce this
hazard
is to comply with the "Operating Instructions for Manually-Propelled,
Rolling
Dolly, Avery Fisher Hall - Job #1416" and lock the removable track section
in
place.
b)On or before July 13, 1998, on the roof, employees who moved a manually
propelled powered platform for building maintenance along its track to the
work
location did not attach the draw bar from the counterweight dolly to the
unit and
move the assembly together to the work location.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
Among others, a feasible method to eliminate or to materially reduce this
hazard
is comply with the "Operating Instructions for Manually-Propelled Rolling
Dolly,
Avery Fisher hall - Job # 1416" and attach the counterweight dolly to the
unit and
move the assembly together to the work location.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1750.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1910.66 I01 II

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 1999
Abate by
Jan 25, 1999
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1750.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 1999
Abate by
Jan 25, 1999
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1750.00
  • — Z (S) $2500.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 300618246.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.