DILLON, SC —
OSHA Inspection: SHANE DAVIS & ASSOCIATES
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of SHANE DAVIS & ASSOCIATES in 938 PEE DEE CHURCH ROAD, DILLON, SC 29536 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 301769485.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SHANE DAVIS & ASSOCIATES
- Site address
- 938 PEE DEE CHURCH ROAD
- City
- DILLON
- State
- SC
- ZIP
- 29536
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 4095, WINTER HAVEN, FL 33880
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1721
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
10012 A
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
SCRR 71-112A: Failed to furnish a place of employment which is free of recognized hazards which may cause death or serious physical harm to his employees and comply with this regulation and other occupational safety and health rules and regulations promulgated under Chapter 15 of Title 41, Code of Laws, State of South Carolina, 1976, as amended, as follows: A. Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a personnel basket being hoisted by a drum type hoist with no trial lift being conducted were exposed to the hazard of falling up to and in excess of 1200 feet to the ground, on or about June 24, 1998. A feasible and useful method, among others, is to perform a trial lift prior to having employees work from the basket, to detect and/or prevent system failure due to overload. B. Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a personnel basket being hoisted by a drum type hoist without a complete visual inspection were exposed to the hazard of falling up to and in excess of 1200 feet to the ground, on or about June 24, 1998. A feasible and useful method, among others, is to perform a complete visual inspection of the basket and cable after the trial lift and prior to having employees work from the basket. C. Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a personnel basket being hoisted by a drum type hoist, on or about June 24, 1998, with not prelift meetings to discuss procedures, limitations, and precautions were exposed to the hazards of falls while using improper procedures, overloading, and/or not taking proper precautions. A useful and feasible method, among others, is to have prelift meetings to discuss all pertinent safety items prior to lifting. D. Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a personnel basket with no grabrail being hoisted by a drum type hoist were exposed to the hazard of falling out of basket that was up to and in excess of 1200 feet, on or about June 24, 1998. A feasible and useful method, among others, is to install a grabrail inside the personnel basket. E. Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a personnel basket being hoisted by a drum type hoist with no anti-two block system were exposed to the hazard of falls up to and in excess of 1200 feet, on or about June 24, 1998. A feasible and useful method, among others, is to install an anti-two blocking type device or hoisting deactivation system to the equipment.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
1926.50 C
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
1926.552 A02
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1926.552 C09
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1926.552 C14 II
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
1926.553 A04
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 1999
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1926.501 B15
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1998
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 1999
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 15, 1998
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 1999
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in SC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 301769485.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.