Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SHANE DAVIS & ASSOCIATES

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of SHANE DAVIS & ASSOCIATES in 938 PEE DEE CHURCH ROAD, DILLON, SC 29536 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 301769485.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Shane Davis & Associates — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Shane Davis & Associates is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
938 PEE DEE CHURCH ROAD
City
DILLON
State
SC
ZIP
29536
Mailing
P. O. BOX 4095, WINTER HAVEN, FL 33880
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1721
Employees
4
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Construction safety.

10 citations on file for this inspection.

10012 A

Serious Gravity 03 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Dec 18, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
SCRR 71-112A: Failed to furnish a place of employment which is free of
recognized hazards
which may cause death or serious physical harm to his employees and comply
with this
regulation and other occupational safety and health rules and regulations
promulgated under
Chapter 15 of Title 41, Code of Laws, State of South Carolina, 1976, as
amended, as
follows:
A.  Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a
personnel basket
being hoisted by a drum type hoist with no trial lift being conducted were
exposed to the
hazard of falling up to and in excess of 1200 feet to the ground, on or
about June 24, 1998.
A feasible and useful method, among others, is to perform a trial lift
prior to having
employees work from the basket, to detect and/or prevent system failure
due to overload.
B.  Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a
personnel basket
being hoisted by a drum type hoist without a complete visual inspection
were exposed to the
hazard of falling up to and in excess of 1200 feet to the ground, on or
about June 24, 1998.
A feasible and useful method, among others, is to perform a complete
visual inspection of
the basket and cable after the trial lift and prior to having employees
work from the basket.
C.  Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a
personnel basket
being hoisted by a drum type hoist, on or about June 24, 1998, with not
prelift meetings to
discuss procedures, limitations, and precautions were exposed to the
hazards of falls while
using improper procedures, overloading, and/or not taking proper
precautions.  A useful and
feasible method, among others, is to have prelift meetings to discuss all
pertinent safety items
prior to lifting.
D.  Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a
personnel basket
with no grabrail being hoisted by a drum type hoist were exposed to the
hazard of falling out
of basket that was up to and in excess of 1200 feet, on or about June 24,
1998.  A feasible
and useful method, among others, is to install a grabrail inside the
personnel basket.
E.  Employer knew or should have known that employees working in a
personnel basket
being hoisted by a drum type hoist with no anti-two block system were
exposed to the hazard
of falls up to and in excess of 1200 feet, on or about June 24, 1998.  A
feasible and useful
method, among others, is to install an anti-two blocking type device or
hoisting deactivation
system to the equipment.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Jan 18, 1999
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $600

1926.50 C

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Jan 18, 1999
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750

1926.552 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Dec 18, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500

1926.552 C09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Dec 18, 1998
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500

1926.552 C14 II

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Dec 18, 1998
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $750

1926.553 A04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Jan 18, 1999
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500

1926.501 B15

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Dec 18, 1998
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $600

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Jan 18, 1999

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 1998
Abate by
Jan 18, 1999

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 301769485.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.