Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: GENERAL SIGNAL DBA REVCO/LINBERG

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GENERAL SIGNAL DBA REVCO/LINBERG in 275 AIKEN ROAD, ASHEVILLE, NC 28804 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 301830360.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch General Signal DBA Revco/Linberg for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for General Signal DBA Revco/Linberg is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
275 AIKEN ROAD
City
ASHEVILLE
State
NC
ZIP
28804
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3585
Employees
550
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

9 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Aug 22, 1997
Penalty
Initial $500 · Current $500
North Carolina General Statute 95-129 (1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to each of his employees
conditions of employment and
a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to
cause death or serious physical harm to employees:
(a)Vipros punch press #357, employees climbing atop press were not provide
with
fall protection.
(b)Iron phosphate wash machine, employees climbing atop machine were not
provided with fall protection.
Note:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement
method to correct this hazard is to provide employee with a
harness and lanyard and a point to attach.

1910.134 E05

Serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Aug 7, 1997
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300

1910.134 E05 I

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Aug 2, 1997

1910.215 B09

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Aug 2, 1997
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300

1910.23 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Aug 22, 1997

1910.23 E03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Aug 12, 1997

1910.252 C03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Sep 23, 1997
Recent events (2)
  • · P (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Aug 12, 1997

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 1997
Abate by
Aug 2, 1997

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 301830360.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.