Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS, INC. in 2115 E. CLUB BLVD., DURHAM, NC 27704 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 302123278.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Accident Reconstruction Analysis, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Accident Reconstruction Analysis, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2115 E. CLUB BLVD.
City
DURHAM
State
NC
ZIP
27704
Mailing
5801 LEASE LANE, RALEIGH, NC 27613
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
9999
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 1998
Abate by
Jul 26, 1998
Penalty
Initial $700
North Carolina General Statue 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to each of his employees
conditions of employment and
a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to
cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were
exposed to: crushing
injuries:
a)transfer point-employee was riding half inside and half outside of a
Case 821B
wheeled loader while attempting to operate a camcorder. (ref para 4.3 SAE
J153
May 87, and page 7 Machine Operation of the Case 821B Loader Operators
Manual Rac 9-23935)
One possible abatement would be for the employer to ensure only trained,
qualified, and authorized employees ride on equipment and all equipment
manufacturers operating procedures are followed.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O)
  • — Z (S) $700.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 1998
Abate by
Jul 26, 1998
Penalty
Initial $700
North Carolina General Statue 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to each of his employees
conditions of employment and
a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to
cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were
exposed to: crushing
injuries:
a)transfer point-an untrained employee was attempting to operate a Case
821B
wheeled loader and a camcorder, in an effort to recreate a fatal accident
by
having the operator instruct him on it's operation.(ref para 4.1 SAE J153
May
87,)
One possible abatement would be to instruct each employee in the
recognition and
avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work
environment.  Further, restrict operation of equipment to those that have
been
trained and authorized to utilize such equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $700.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 1998
Abate by
Jul 26, 1998
Penalty
Initial $700
North Carolina General Statue 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish to each of his employees
conditions of employment and
a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were
causing or likely to
cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were
exposed to: crushing
injuries:
a)transfer point-employee was laying on the ground at the site of an
accident to
recreate the incident by having a Case 821B drive toward him while a fellow
employee, riding on the vehicle, taped the procedure with a camcorder.
(ref para
6.1 SAE J153 May 87, and pages 6&7 Machine Operation of the Case 821B
Loader Operators Manual Rac 9-23935)
One possible abatement would be to instruct each employee in the
recognition and
avoidance of unsafe conditions and to the regulations applicable to unsafe
work
areas.  Further, all safety precautions outlined in the equipment
manufacturers
operating manual shall be adhered to.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $700.00

View Accident Reconstruction Analysis, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 302123278.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.